This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose - I'm not really sure why we are super sure this is a proper noun. I had a look through the sources and it doesn't look like UEFA treats it as a proper noun. Do we have some good English language sources to see if they treat it as a proper noun? Lee Vilenski(talk • contribs)23:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes: [1][2] but it looks like the f is typically not capitalised when viewing other related article refs. Responding to @Stevie fae Scotland: obviously in all cases "final" is a subsequent word in all articles which have that title. If we do follow WP:NCCAPS that could mean many of the other articles would be moved from "Final" to "final", i.e. making the f a lower case letter and makes that consistent among all the articles, including the UEFA Women's Euro ones. I'm now half thinking of disagreeing with myself after yesterday's edit here. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 22:56, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I accept that means moving a lot of articles but we wouldn't be in this position if we'd followed the guideline in the first place. It's just one of those things. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 23:08, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose and fix consistency the other way, consistent with guidelines, instead. I suggest utilizing TolBot to do the mass moves. See Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/TolBot 13D for examples of how that's done. I can help if desired. After the moves, there's a lot of cleanup work to do, which can also be semi-automated or maybe automated; happy to discuss and maybe help. I've done similar for tens of thousands of tennis, basketball, baseball, etc. articles this year. See list of 4500 article names ending in "Final". Dicklyon (talk) 23:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.