Contents

Talk:UK Joint Special Forces Selection

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: British / European This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  British military history task force European military history task force

Is there anything on this page that is backed up by more than what Andy McNab wrote in Immediate Action?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.239.157 (talk) 20:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Had a talk with an idiot who turned out to actually be a former officer in the SBS reserves, he claimed all Royal Marines are Special Forces, which made me laugh. I concluded the SBS reserves are for Ruperts who got into the Royal Marines because of family connections and who can't cut it as actual Special Forces. The British SF have a high mortality rate even on selection and especially in operations, imagine having to fight three armed enemies coming at you with nothing but a hammer! That scumbag insulted all the SF guys who have died on SF operations, yes the Royal Marines have a tough selection and often become full SBS and even as Marines put their lives on the line but they aren't risking their lives like the SAS guys, no fucking way. I told him he should go to Hereford on a Friday night and tell people there how the Royal Marines are exactly like the SAS.

Someone please rewrite the last bit of that section, as it doesn't really fit.

If it's statistically significant, what is it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigturnip (talk • contribs) 19:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This whole section reads like it was written by a 15 year old. Sketch map has been out for nearly 20 years! The last thing on anybody's mind on Atap Hurdle is persistent damp. Comical. As above, copied from unreliable books. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.133.150.142 (talk) 16:20, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Time of continuation training lacked citiation and contradicted two sources I have read in the past, editied it, may be wrong as sources may be unreliable. From what I've read jungle training takes place after a 14 week combat and survival training course, again sources could be wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.215.153.87 (talk) 15:01, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I always heard you could not apply for the SAS until you'd served three years in the infantry. Is this still the case? There is no mention of it in the article. Valetude (talk) 00:06, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:222nd Broadcast Operations Detachment (BOD) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:51, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 November 2022[edit]

Joint Special Forces Selection (JSFS) → UK Joint Special Forces Selection - The article was moved last month by Rome628 from United Kingdom Special Forces Selection citing the Royal Navy's Naval Personnel Management dated February 2022 as the correct name of the course.^[1] The name of the course in the publication is UK Joint Special Forces Selection. Note: there is a move request open to remove the acronym JSFS from the current title. Melbguy05 (talk) 10:59, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]