Contents

Talk:Unbroken (film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Unbroken (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Athletics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Film: War / American This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles This article is supported by the War films task force. This article is supported by the American cinema task force. Pritzker Military Library Low‑importance This article is related to the Pritzker Military Museum & Library WikiProject. Please copy assessments of the article from the most major WikiProject template to this one as needed.Pritzker Military LibraryWikipedia:GLAM/PritzkerTemplate:WikiProject Pritzker-GLAMPritzker Military Library-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Military history: War films / Asian / Japanese / North America / United States / World War II Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  War films task force Asian military history task force Japanese military history task force North American military history task force United States military history task force World War II task force

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 2 times. The weeks in which this happened: December 21 to 27, 2014 (24th) December 28, 2014 to January 3, 2015 (23rd)

I noticed a few mistakes in the movie, as an example: the aircraft in which the main character returns home in 1945, a Lockheed 12, not only shows incorrect national marking (red dot was removed in 1942) but the current registration (VH-HID, see pic @ airliners.net pic). Are these kind of things worth noting in the article? Regards, DPdH (talk) 23:28, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cyberbot II has detected links on Unbroken (film) which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: localorglobal If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locallyorglobally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• https://www.change.org/p/the-japanese-embassy-in-washington-d-c-stop-the-ban-on-angelina-jolie-s-movie-unbroken-in-japan

  Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:18, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cyberbot II has detected links on Unbroken (film) which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: localorglobal If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locallyorglobally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• https://www.change.org/p/the-japanese-embassy-in-washington-d-c-stop-the-ban-on-angelina-jolie-s-movie-unbroken-in-japan

  Triggered by \bchange\.org\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:54, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved

The lead paragraph states: "Zamperini survived in a raft for 47 days after his bomber was downed in World War II"

Later in the same article and per film content, his plane actually had a mechanical failure and crashed - it was not "downed" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.151.31.33 (talk) 15:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The sequel-section states that "Unbroken: Path to Redemtion" is a "spiritual sequel" The WP article "Spiritual sequel" is defined as "[a film that] does not build upon the storyline established by a previous work as do most traditional prequels or sequels, yet features many of the same elements, themes, and styles". This does not seem to be true, quite the opposite, the storyline seems to pick up just where the first Unbroken ended, but the themes, elements and style seems to be rather different.

Perhaps "spiritual sequel" could also be interpreted to mean "faith-themed sequel". However, this is already stated in the same sentence.

Thus, perhaps "spiritual sequel" should be justified, clarified or removed? St.nerol (talk) 17:30, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This may explain why. Maybe say "unofficial sequel" instead and explain why? Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 17:58, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We shouldn't say "spiritual sequel" not only because that is not how the phrase is usually used as defined in the article Spiritual sequel (as in "Everybody Wants Some!! is a 'spiritual sequel' to Dazed and Confused") but also because it doesn't add anything readily useful to readers.

We could say "unofficial sequel", sure, but doesn't the fact that a producer from the previous movie is involved in the new one make it rather an official sequel? Also the official site for the new film says it's based on Hillenbrand's book (also seen in the billing block) so it seems it is at least an official adaptation of the book the 2014 film was also based on.

So it appears the most objective way to put it is that it is yet another adaptation of Hillenbrand's book that depicts Zamperini's later life following the events that were depicted in the 2014 film, in which no one from the original cast returns. Nardog (talk) 12:09, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've checked out the grammar in the article and everything seems to be in order. I have rated the article as B-class for now. --NowIsntItTime 22:33, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't think it's quite there yet. It's very close though. MPS1992 (talk) 22:38, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, what needs to be done? The referencing was reported to be in order, along with the coverage, structure and supporting materials. Is there something that really needs to be fixed? --NowIsntItTime 23:49, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kaitlynluczak (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Kaitlynluczak (talk) 18:24, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]