Contents

Talk:United States Exploring Expedition

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. History of Science Mid‑importance This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Smithsonian Institution Low‑importance This article is within the scope of Smithsonian Institution WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Smithsonian Institution and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Smithsonian InstitutionWikipedia:GLAM/Smithsonian InstitutionTemplate:WikiProject Smithsonian InstitutionSmithsonian Institution-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Oregon Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. stateofOregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Is the appended date really necessary? I thought there was only one expedition ever called "United States Exploring Expedition". Stan 04:41, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC) ___________________

The appended date isn't absolutely necessary. It seemed like a good idea, though, in order to help readers note the context more quickly. Also, it provides more info to search on when doing Google searches on article titles. Herodotos 02:47, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

The usual rule is to use the shortest unambiguous title for articles, if for no other reason than to increase the chance that random references from elsewhere will connect - we have a problem with people creating dups because they see a red link and don't realize that the real article is under a slightly different name (I fixed up a mistaken dup creation just this morning). Google searches hit on content just as much as title, so titling can be set to favor our internal linking activity. Stan 03:06, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Good point, and thanks for the heads-up on policy. I don't mind renaming the article, if that will improve consistency. Or would it be easier at this point to create a "Redirect" to the shorter title? Herodotos 04:35, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Peruvian Andes2.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on April 25, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-04-25. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng {chat} 18:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the sumary the result of the expedition is listed as "Successful expedition, victory in battle against aborigionals."

Victory in battle against aboriginals is an objective of expedition? Surely this was an unfortunate outcome, not something to laud as part of their success? I suggest that it would be more accurate if the result is changed to "Successful expedition despite conflict with aboriginal peoples". Djapa Owen 12:35, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Looks like some inconsistency here. I suspect ALL this happened in 1841 - anyone care to check, and reconcile?

• "In April 1842 USS Peacock...around 700 Gilbertese warriors opposed the American assault but were defeated after a long battle."
• "A similar episode occurred two months before in February when the Peacock and the Flying Fish briefly bombarded the island of Upolu, Samoa..." (Bombardment of Upolu = where February 24, 1841 is the date given)
• "The Peacock was lost in July 1841 on the Columbia River, though with no loss of life..."

The battle format infobox seems incredibly non-NPOV here, especially given that the outcome-as-battle was challenged on the talk page in 2011 without response. If it was an article about a specific battle, fine, but this is an article about a four-year scientific expedition. Is there someone to defend the use of the current infobox format? — Brianhe (talk) 00:36, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have a very good point there. Exploration is not war. Some other kind of info-box format must make more sense. Djapa Owen (talk) 03:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An overall map showing the routes explored would be very helpful. A plot on a modern map is was I had in mind, but it would actually be extremely interesting to see the maps produced by the expedition itself, of the same areas. -- Beland (talk) 01:31, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Poking around I found [1] and File:Charles wilkes part1.png but these aren't quite ready for use in this article. -- Beland (talk) 20:18, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added an image I found on Czech Wikipedia - https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_South_Seas_Exploring_Expedition. Cheers. Grahamboat (talk) 19:13, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on United States Exploring Expedition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090803084613/http://siarchives.si.edu//history/exhibits/baird/bairdb.htmtohttp://siarchives.si.edu/history/exhibits/baird/bairdb.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.collphyphil.org/Site/FIND_AID/hist/histcfg1.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120415171721/http://www.museumsiskiyoutrail.org/tohttp://www.museumsiskiyoutrail.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the military conflict infobox since I feel that it puts undue weight on the conflicts that were fought during the expedition. The expedition's objective was to explore and to survey unchartered areas. It might have been a military undertaking, but it wasn't a punitive expedition. What especially bothers me is the infobox's supposed "result". I mean, "defeat of aboriginal peoples" doesn't really correspond to what I guess would be a considered a desired outcome to a scientific expedition.

While I think the article is fine without an infobox, it got me thinking about maybe designing an infobox specifically for scientific and explorative expeditions.

Anyways, I also kept the mapped routes, but moved them further down the article. Jay D. Easy (talk) 16:58, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]