![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
what does it mean university according to student — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.192.65.193 (talk) 19:56, 10 June 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I see that this page has not been edited in quite a while, and that the person who started it has unfortunately left Wikipedia. Because of this, I will keep an eye on it. I have started restructuring it - updating it by getting info from [1] but this will be a somewhat "slo-mo" process due to... well, the fact that I am not 100% employed with full pay as a wiki contributor 8) --Misha bb (talk) 21:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if it deserves stub status, by the way. It's already quite long and elaborate. Maybe that tag is outdated? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Misha bb (talk • contribs) 21:38, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Portal is being made at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:University_of_the_Arctic Purpose: To be a gateway for (a) everything to do with the UArctic structure; (b) all UArctic organizations and institutions; (c) biographies, institutions, events, groups etc. relevant to (c1) UArctic itself and/or (c2) Arctic academic activities. --Misha bb (talk) 14:54, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Has this section been left untranslated from another wiki? Or can it be expanded to explain what it means? twilsonb (talk) 08:09, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
At least the Programs section contains parts/sentences that have been copied from the UArctic website. They should probably be deleted or rephrased. Torsti (talk) 20:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The pages University of the Arctic members and University of the Arctic governance don't seem to be so extensive or notable that they need to stand on their own. The members page is out of date and the article on governance confusing. They should probably be merged or deleted. Also, Category:University of the Arctic seems rather redundant as all articles listed there are linked to from the main article. Torsti (talk) 20:29, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on University of the Arctic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is in part raised in #Merging separate articles above but I think it deserves its own section.
The article currently reads in part There are 143 members of UArctic, which includes 174 members. Similarly the article on members currently reads in part There are 143 member institutions of UArctic, most of which are educational institutions and most of which are from the Arctic states (listed below). In addition, there are 21 members from non-Arctic states.
The intent is clear enough... there are two classes of membership. This is backed up by https://www.uarctic.org/member-profiles/non-arctic/ which reads in part UArctic also has members from outside the Arctic states, who nevertheless share the same commitment to promoting higher education and research in the Circumpolar North. So non-arctic members are in fact members, and the claim that there are only 143 members is, strictly speaking, false, and at best confusing.
So some rephrasing is indicated IMO. Comments? Andrewa (talk) 21:55, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In that nobody has replied despite a heads-up at the more specific article talk, it's probably best that I just boldly fix it. Andrewa (talk) 18:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]