Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Untitled  
1 comment  




2 GA Review  
7 comments  


2.1  Lead Section  





2.2  Body Paragraphs  





2.3  Sources  





2.4  Finishing Comments  
















Talk:Utah State Route 313




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Good articleUtah State Route 313 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassessit.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 25, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Untitled[edit]

Might try to do a GA review later. RockManQ (talk) 22:07, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Utah State Route 313/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hello, I'm RockManQ and I'll be your reviewer (Note: my first review so be a little patient, but don't be afraid to challenge my suggestions). So without -ahem- further ado, let's get this started.

Lead Section[edit]

I'm sure you know and have reviewed WP:LEAD, but I'll link it here anyways.

The lead section of an article is what most people read first, so it's where I'm going to start.

A few suggestions:

I think that's all for now, when we address these we can move on to more, as I said earlier though I am open to being overruled on these. RockManQ (talk) 22:28, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(FYI) I won't be on for a couple of hours. RockManQ (talk) 22:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All done.Mitch32(UP) 03:29, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, good. Looks like everything has been resolved there. On forth! RockManQ (talk) 04:07, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Body Paragraphs[edit]

Route description and History will be discussed here.

Again, few suggestions:

Otherwise that's it. RockManQ (talk) 04:07, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All changed around.Mitch32(UP) 14:07, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

Are the sources good?

Found an archived abstract of the article, linked that for now.Mitch32(UP) 14:07, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Finishing Comments[edit]

I'm going to go ahead and put these here for the sake of it.

Ok, now that you're done with all above stuff we'll get to here.

Agood article is— </noinclude>

  1. Well-written: Pass
    (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and
    (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  2. Verifiable with no original research: Pass
    (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); and
    (c) it contains no original research.
  3. Broad in its coverage: Pass
    (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. Pass; no POV found
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.; Pass; quite stable, not even sure if there's been one vandalism edit yet
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:; Pass
    (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Utah_State_Route_313&oldid=1201473147"

Categories: 
Wikipedia good articles
Engineering and technology good articles
GA-Class U.S. state highway articles
Mid-importance U.S. state highway articles
GA-Class Road transport articles
Mid-importance Road transport articles
U.S. state highway articles
GA-Class Utah road transport articles
Mid-importance Utah road transport articles
Utah road transport articles
GA-Class U.S. road transport articles
Mid-importance U.S. road transport articles
U.S. road transport articles
GA-Class United States articles
Mid-importance United States articles
GA-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
GA-Class Utah articles
Mid-importance Utah articles
WikiProject Utah articles
WikiProject United States articles
 



This page was last edited on 31 January 2024, at 18:29 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki