Contents

Talk:Vali (Ramayana)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Hinduism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. India Stub‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Stub This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Opening heading[edit]

theres a story tht vali defeated ravana in a duel...and help him pinned down for many years...on his death bed he is said to have told ram of this and abt ram's foolishness in killing him as he could have brought back sita in a day...if anyone can add this anecdote about him in the article Sidmohata 04:57, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bali (Ramayana) → Vali (Ramayana) – Revert to Original title, which is the original Sanskrit name Monier Williams Mbh critical edition. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 16:25, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. Whatever else it is treated as, the Ramayana is first of all a classic Sanskrit epic, and the form used here should follow the Sanskrit rather than any Prakrit or derivative variant. It is sufficient that those variant forms be accounted for in the lead, as they are now. Noetica^Tea? 02:31, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.