Contents

Talk:Wajik

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages. Southeast Asia: Brunei This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Southeast Asia-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Southeast AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Southeast AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Southeast AsiaSoutheast Asia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Brunei (assessed as Low-importance). Indonesia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Malaysia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malaysia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malaysia and Malaysia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MalaysiaWikipedia:WikiProject MalaysiaTemplate:WikiProject MalaysiaMalaysia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Origin section

[edit]

Dishes and confectionaries with the combination of sticky rice and palm sugar has a long history in Java. Subsequently, wajik has has occupied certain role in Javanese tradition, for example the Numplak Wajik ceremony held by Keraton Yogyakarta as part of Grebeg Muludan during Sekaten festival.

HiGunkarta, I would suggest if you can find verified statements which explicitly states that wajik is from Java (or something like that), instead of assumptive statements as what you have put as above. If that's the case, I could argue it is the same for Brunei, as sweet rice-based snacks have also existed in Brunei since 1500s as accounted by Antonio Pigafetta. Azuru79 (talk) 17:17, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done add ref. Gunkarta  talk  18:02, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think there should be a specific section elaborate about the ingredients and shape section. It would be weird if a food article did not allow an ingredients section as Azuru79 has repeatedly undo my edits and involved in edit wars here, here, here, and here. I would like to invite other editors to resolve this edit war problem. Meanwhile I'll stand back. Gunkarta  talk  18:02, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

HiGunkarta, there is nothing weird about not having Ingredients section as plenty of established food articles do not have such section. Wikipedia is not a recipe book; it should be described in encyclopedic manner. It would be weirder if the Ingredients section of a regional dish only describe a specific country. By the way, I repeatedly undo your edits because you repeatedly undo my edits. Also, I never reverted your edits but rather a subsequent edit to a previous edit which was done by you, I was merely moving your contents to a more appropriate section and you should have just continue from there. Besides, I never had the automatic revert edit power. Hope you understand. Azuru79 (talk) 18:16, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Look, that is your opinion on not having ingredients section. I would like other editors saying on this. About edit wars, I was editing when you interupting my edit and I asked you to wait for me to complete my edits and add refs. But no..., you stubbornly insisted on reverting my edit causing edit conflicts. Let see how we resolve this based on consensus. Thank you. Gunkarta  talk  18:24, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sounds like my opinion is invalid to you. My point above is not to shut down your opinion, just merely disagreeing. I would also welcome other editors, especially outside of Indonesia to review this issue. My edits should not affect whatever progress you were making, I was merely moving the contents, I wasn't even changing a single word of your content sentences and references. I don't know why you feel offended by that and exercised your automatic revert edit power when you could have just continued from there. Peace. Azuru79 (talk) 18:35, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]