Contents

Talk:Warning label

	This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

12312313 I heard some moron tried to use McDonalds cuz she burnt herself on the coffee. I heard now Starbucks don't serve hot coffee anymore. You can get coffee, but it's not hot.

The case you mentioned is Liebeck v. McDonald's Corp. --cesarb 17:51, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think maybe that this article should mention that there are some rediculous warning labels as a result of lawsuits. On many products it says "do not smoke" or "do not eat". -- Frap 20:11, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It does mention it already: "Some of them are intended to prevent lawsuits against the item's manufacturer, which sometimes results in labels which state the obvious." --cesarb 17:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

its my first time editing, so if anyone spots problems, please feel free to fix them. I included a link to M-law, i hope its the right thing to do mrbearbear83 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrbearbear83 (talk • contribs) 20:31, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So far the article makes it look as though only cigarettes have warning labels. Links to US and international regulations are needed. 99.11.160.111 (talk) 16:46, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added some references to international organizations that oversee warning labels. We need some images of the Danger, Warning and Caution labels. eximo (talk) 19:43, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	An image used in this article, File:Personal watercraft warning sticker.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:58, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]