Contents

Talk:Watertown, South Dakota

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

South Dakota High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. stateofSouth Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

It is requested that a photographbeincluded in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in South Dakota may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Should the popular attactions part be deleted? I think so...

I would think not. They are relevant to the social life of the community, and, if any of them have articles of their own, it would be logical to link to them. Badbilltucker 21:58, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Badbilltucker. This page is important, and is also part of fulfilling a student's assignment. Let it stay as is, ok? Doc1410 17:39, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also agree with Badbilltucker. why do you think it deserved to be deleted? Halo2 Gamer 17:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well they have been because the articles themselves have been deleted.Spiesr 17:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does this image have the nessary sorce information? I ask because the last one was deleted because of this.Spiesr 17:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this be called refrences like on the rest of wikipedia?Spiesr 14:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

agreed. It is not a publication, but is instead an encyclopedia. This should be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.235.241.102 (talk) 23:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This section reads like a story not an encyclopedia article. Spiesr 21:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Examples? 84.13.149.202 (talk) 12:35, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Page view counts combining pages in Category:Watertown, South Dakota and Category:Codington County, South Dakota:

• Massviews (all-time)
• Massviews (latest-20 days)

For the curious. --bp0 (talk) 10:43, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Timmy Williams is definitely from Watertown. According to the Popularity Contest link above, Timmy Williams is the fifth most popular topic related to Watertown, SD. Yet, someone (User:MillLocke) keeps removing him without any comment. Stop that. --bp0 (talk) 02:59, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]