Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 GA Review  
3 comments  













Talk:West Worldham




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Good articleWest Worldham has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassessit.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 2, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know

Afact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 13, 2012.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that naturalist and ornithologist Gilbert White immortalized the localities of West Worldham and East Worldham and the surrounding region in his The Natural History and Antiquities of Selborne (1789)?

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:West Worldham/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (talk · contribs) 16:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a(prose): b(MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a(references): b(citations to reliable sources): c(OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a(major aspects): b(focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a(images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b(appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Another great job, Dr. Blofeld! --Thine Antique Pen (talkcontributions) 16:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reviews, I'm used to a lot more criticism though! They're not as good as nearby Bentworth but they're smaller villages and are pretty comprehensive on what exists on the web. West Worldham is a hamlet really.♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:02, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:West_Worldham&oldid=1203688387"

Categories: 
Wikipedia good articles
Geography and places good articles
Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
GA-Class Hampshire articles
Low-importance Hampshire articles
 



This page was last edited on 5 February 2024, at 11:00 (UTC).

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki