Contents

Talk:Westerlund 1-243

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy: Astronomical objects Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.

On 13 March 2023, it was proposed that this article be movedtoWesterlund 1 W243. The result of the discussion was procedural close.

Could anyone help me to short down the spectrum section? It's way too long. Nussun05 (talk) 12:22, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure? Maybe you wrote this and then edited it yourself, but I'd say it could easily be longer. Easy to forget, but essentially everything we know about the star comes from its spectrum. Very important. Lithopsian (talk) 19:14, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Done now anyway Nussun05 (talk) 20:11, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the move request was: procedural close. This isn't really a "no consensus" due to low attendance. Initial nominator now prefers a different name and should nominate all relevant pages for that together as a new RM. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 04:15, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Westerlund 1-243 → Westerlund 1 W243 – Per discussion from Talk:Westerlund 1 W26#Requested move 9 February 2023. However, I know the title of one of references currently used in the article referred this star to as Westerlund 1-243 (the current title for the article), but most papers, even the rest of the said source, still refer it to simply as W243. Regards—ZaperaWiki44^{(✉/Contribs)} 18:13, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose: as with W26, we shouldn't be making up designations that aren't in use in the real world. "Westerlund 1 W243" as such doesn't seem to be used anywhere, except for sources copied from Wikipedia. The close "Cl* Westerlund 1 W 243" is listed at Simbad, even closer if we choose to drop the "Cl*", but that is essentially just made up based on sources that only use the term "W243". W243 is in widespread use, albeit in situations where the context of being in Westerlund 1 is obvious. That title for a Wikipedia article is available, although disambiguating such a short designation might be wiser. W243 (star) would seem to be both unambiguous and accurate. Similar to W26, the term "Wd1-W243" has been used once, and "Wd1 W243" a handful of times. Lithopsian (talk) 14:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How about Westerlund 1 W26 then. Should we have moved Westerlund 1 W26toW26 (star) to begin with? Regards—ZaperaWiki44^{(✉/Contribs)} 15:33, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.