Contents

Talk:White ribbon

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Feminism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[White#Usage, symbolism, colloquial expressions|Symbolism of white]] The anchor (#Usage, symbolism, colloquial expressions) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Um, while I'm sure this article covers the most notable symbology, I've seen plenty of lists that included "abstinence" and "bone cancer research" as other common meanings for the white awareness ribbon. Why do these not get a mention? Runa27 22:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because "abstinence" and "bone cancer research" don't want anything to do with a misandrist movement that somehow evades Canada's rather thorough hate-crime laws? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.77.66.165 (talk) 10:42, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

abstinence falls under the useage of the WCTU. The WCTU has used the white ribbon to signify abstinence since 1873. I have made that the FIRST and MOST PROMINENT use. -- Further, the article fails to cite the white ribbon against pornography campaign, and I'll try to fix that later. Rick Boatright (talk) 14:35, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• www.white-ribbon.org.uk - given that the name is White Ribbon is it worth including them?86.177.207.128 (talk) 02:02, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"The WCTU claims to be the oldest continuing non-sectarian women's organization worldwide. However the oldest continuing non-sectarian women's organization is the LDS Relief Society founded in 1842." This kinda reads like '... but they're totally wrong - so there![citation unnecessary]'. Also the LDS Relief Society is hardly non-sectarian, they're a direct arm of the LDS church and claim all women in the LDS church as members. Refer to their website. 2601:603:4202:DF0:94B7:45F2:E2A8:D459 (talk) 00:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The image Image:Wctu logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:11, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed "In Belgium, white ribbon is a pro-capital punishment symbol." from the Other uses section. Being Belgian myself and never having heard of such a thing as well as finding no basis whatsoever for this unsourced statement, this does not belong in the article unless a valid source is given. - Vadigor (talk) 23:03, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does such a movement really exist? Is there a "pro-violence against women movement"? 75.118.170.35 (talk) 19:46, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The symbol of Forgiveness is the yellow ribbon: Thomas S. Monson, current president of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints cites the story as the precursor to the tradition of the yellow ribbon for welcome home and forgiveness. (see the sources).

So Forgiveness is a part of the article about Yellow ribbon and must be deleted from this atricle.--Vladimir Shelyapin 05:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Владимир Шеляпин (talk • contribs)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on White ribbon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100415050718/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/content_display/news/e3i682d2ee2ce2c81787efa92021b1a0831tohttp://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3i682d2ee2ce2c81787efa92021b1a0831

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:23, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]