This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
William Field's strategic role in moving cargo and personnel in and out of one of Earth's most remote regions warrants a substantive and well-researched article. With the right input, we could develop this into a featured article nomination.
It's going to be tough sledding to get a featured article nomination out of this topic. I find very little that has been written about William's Field, Antartica's oldest and arguably most important airport.--Fishdecoy 00:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Does anyone have any reliable sources with which they can build this article re:
In particular, it looks like there are plans underway to once again move Williams before it falls into McMurdo Sound. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fishdecoy (talk • contribs) 21:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
This page seems to report many things about the Sea ice runway (instead of Willy Field) which should probably be moved there. Mtruch 20:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As principal author of the article to date, I may have strayed too far from the Williams airfield in including content about the sea-ice and blue-ice runways. In part, I am trying to help the reader understand the extraordinary air operations in and around Williams Field, all of which are inter-connected operationally. My yet unreferenced thesis is that Williams Field is the hub of these operations. For instance, Williams appears to the only "airport" of the three runways, in terms of central command features, such as weather observers, crash and fire control, communications, etc. I am currently looking for citations that indicate whether or not Williams is the flight control center for all three airstirps at McMurdo: Williams snow runway, the annual ice runway, and the blue-ice runway. I welcome anyone's help in the search.--Fishdecoy 12:38, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This page refers to moving the the airport infrastructure from the sea-ice runway to Williams Field, in advance of the annual ice breakup: Moving the Airport--Fishdecoy 17:41, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Research confirms that there are 3 separate airports at McMurdo Station. Subsequently, your observations are correct, Mtruch, about moving the Sea ice runway info. I am in the process of doing so now. --Fishdecoy 16:53, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can anyone confirm that the article's WILLIAMSFIELD.jpg is a pic of Williams Field? The caption ("in front of McMurdo ..." makes me wonder if the photo may be of the sea ice runway, which during its seasonal operations is indeed in front of McMurdo. However, Williams is farther away. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fishdecoy (talk • contribs) 17:18, 17 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]
I suspect that this image may depict an aircraft at the sea ice runway, rather than Williams Field. Only ski-equipped aircraft can land at Williams. Any aircraft experts out there that can interpret this picture?--Fishdecoy 17:24, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I removed this pic. Research shows that this type of plane would land at an ice runway, not Williams Field. See: http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/news/02/pr0214.htm In addtion, the existing photo caption cited the wrong year for the photo.--Fishdecoy 22:12, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 2 external links on Williams Field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
