Contents

Talk:Windows 95

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Windows 95 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days

Development of Windows 95 was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 02 September 2009 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Windows 95. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on August 24, 2004.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Computing: Software Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Mid-importance). Software: Computing High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Mid-importance). Microsoft: Windows High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Microsoft Windows (assessed as Top-importance). Microsoft Windows: Computing Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

@Isi96:

I saw, as of now currently, the article is mainly about Win95 with mention of Win3/31/311 NT3/31/351/40...in MS official release context.
Except one, which is your edit, about unofficial release of dot NET for Win95.

There are many unofficial updates, mod, unofficially release such as unofficially OSR3, however...

...my take is, about unofficial updates/release, I would worried myself if I would to add this, will this would be removed for not WP:NOTABLE enough...

Just saying my observation. --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 15:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I added it because it received a fair amount of coverage in WP:RS.

With regard to unofficial updates, it should be fine to include them provided there's adequate sourcing, such as in the Windows XP article. Isi96 (talk) 23:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

re - on Windows XP - unofficial WinXP SP3 before the real WinXP SP3 (which was in 2005-2007 still within WinXP supported period (way way back to my very 1st account User:Cat12zu ... those were the days...)) & unofficial patch for non-embedded WinXP edition using official 2010s patch for Embedded edition (which is pertaining to 2010s official patch & inofficial unofficial uses)

mmm....I see. On the other hand, I would had create a new sub-section of (Upgradeability) and titled (dot NET backport) & place right at the end within (Upgradeability) section so that it is arranged chronologically. Just my two cents. Thanks for your attention. --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 01:47, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]