Contents

Talk:Women in the workforce

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Feminism High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Women's History High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Gender studies High‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles Cleanup : edit to see Collaborate : see /Collaboration Copyedit : edit to see Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender Expand : edit to see Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes Merge : edit to see Notability : edit to see NPOV : edit to see Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies Split : History of feminism Stubs : see Gender studies stubs Translate : see /translation Update : edit to see Verify : Riot grrrl Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention Occupational Safety and Health B‑class Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles B This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in the Workforce was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 April 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Women in the workforce. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:California State University, Channel Islands/Ethics for a Free World (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

The references on this topic are going to get very lengthy. The topic badly needs to be split into sub-topics on women in individual professional areas. --Lquilter (talk) 17:15, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notes: Searching Amazon for "women in the professions" leads to more than 9,760 items on the topic, mostly books. [1] That's just books indexed in Amazon. The literature in journals will be, of course, incredibly lengthy. Suggestions on how to break these topics down other than by individual profession? --Lquilter (talk) 23:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I have begun creating individual sub-topics for individual professions & will move references sections there as appropriate. --Lquilter (talk) 22:23, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also find the list of recommended reading, even with subheadings by occupation, too lengthy. Each occupation's list would be better moved to a separate article on that particular topic -- Women in engineering, Women in philosophy, etc. In my opinion, anyway. OttawaAC (talk) 04:15, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I started this article with a brief summary at the top, but doing a cursory review of the literature has suggested some sections for the article.

• Individual professional areas - Probably all need to be separate articles
• History of gendered role division; cultural-specific issues
• Legal workplace discrimination issues; glass ceiling - Women's workplace discrimination law; frankly this is at least a separate article, ultimately, but for now can be a subsection of this article
• Women & mentoring - the "old boys network" issues which have been addressed in the literature with a lot of discussion of women's mentoring networks (among other things)
• "Second Shift" & "Mommy track" & "Work-life balance" - Women in the workplace balancing family and work issues; the imbroglio of the NYT's "dropping out" series; gendering of this issue (male work-life balance) etc.
• Influence on family and medical leave policy -- FMLA, etc.
• Influence on workplace codes of conduct; sexual harassment laws; First Amendment backlash
• Relation of gendering with "professionalization" and profession studies; see., e.g., nursing, teaching, librarianship, as gendered professions; transition of professions from male to female (librarianship) leading to feminization of professions, lower pay, etc.
• wage gap discussion

There are lots of other sub-topics to women in the workforce. Thoughts on how to arrange, and other missing subtopics? --Lquilter (talk) 18:04, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "Women's participation in different occupations" section needs to be converted into a navigation template (preferably footer style). Kaldari (talk) 22:20, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Women in the workforce. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071107063131/http://www.admin.cam.ac.uk:80/news/press/factsheets/women2.htmltohttp://www.admin.cam.ac.uk/news/press/factsheets/women2.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:31, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I added a source about workplace discrimination of female. This article is a good explanation of women's inequalities in the workplace. "THE DISRUPTERS. By: KOLHATKAR, SHEELAH, New Yorker, 0028792X, 11/20/2017, Vol. 93, Issue 37"Mengrui Li (talk) 21:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article's bibliography is huge—the longest I've seen. It may be time to WP:SPLITOUT the bibliography to a separate article, like the other bibliography articles in Wikipedia:List of bibliographies?Biogeographist (talk) 17:52, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"In 2017 there are around 74.6 million women in the civilian labor force[4]."

What is the interest of having this passage in the introduction? This figure is about the US's female workforce not worldwide. As such, it should be removed.

176.158.146.38 (talk) 19:06, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've just removed it. I agree that it serves no purpose, and the article is about women in the world's workforce -- not women in the United States workforce. —Panamitsu (talk) 01:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is of course because of the problem added in 2020. Oakime (talk) 17:43, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 September 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gaquach (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Peinini (talk) 22:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added inline citations where it was marked as inline citations needed. --Gaquach (talk) 12:50, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]