Contents

Talk:Working parent

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 January 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Gender studies High‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles Cleanup : edit to see Collaborate : see /Collaboration Copyedit : edit to see Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender Expand : edit to see Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes Merge : edit to see Notability : edit to see NPOV : edit to see Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies Split : History of feminism Stubs : see Gender studies stubs Translate : see /translation Update : edit to see Verify : Riot grrrl Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2018 and 20 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Michsm. Peer reviewers: Jceccarelli04.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 05:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 January 2019 and 8 March 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Maoyi.95.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignmentbyPrimeBOT (talk) 05:05, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone have any concerns that they'd like to share with the rest of us? As it stands, the article is almost entirely sourced to directly-supporting reliable sources. I'd be happy to consider that a school of expert thought has been overlooked, but I've removed the "essay" and "original research" tags pending the appearance of injustly-omitted academic research. FourViolas (talk) 04:21, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the POV tag, as no one responded with any concerns. ParticipantObserver (talk) 14:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Working parent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20160304071301/http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/LMF_1_6_Gender_differences_in_employment_outcomes.pdftohttp://www.oecd.org/els/soc/LMF_1_6_Gender_differences_in_employment_outcomes.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:52, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

lead review[edit]

neutrality notification

• Intro sentence is too wordy and needs to be cleaned up grammatically.
• Delete or their own needs from second sentence.
• Final sentence establishes the intent to center on "gender inequality" for working parents.

Historic viewpoint review[edit]

• Extremely weak reference to television in the 1950's and 60's.
• Entire section is subjective.
• Lacks easily found statistics from the time period that would provide a better representation than comment about television and and extremely opinionated final sentence almost an insult. The entire sentence is unnecessary and weak

Re: "Men went to work to earn money...The gender inequalities that are reflective" The reference to "gender" inequalities is inappropriate in context of this. In the 1960's and early 70's the discussion was around "work value" inequalities - with people lobbying to have housework treated with the same level of respect as paid work. ^[1] Beldings (talk) 13:46, 7 November 2021 (UTC)beldings 09:36, Friday, July 5, 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Motherhood Penalty Fatherhood Bonus[edit]

• Last sentence needs a citation.
• I would like a current statistic to back up the hemogenic masculinity statement, perhaps comparing not only to working mothers but also men that don't fit the mold.
• The entire section feels subjective and unsubstantiated. Needs statistical support.

Working Mothers[edit]

• Entire section needs editing and grammatical revision. Mostly relevant information and interesting comparisons with European.
• Consider breaking up information into time period and region.

Mommy Wars[edit]

• Unnecessary, poorly worded and irrelevant.

Working Father? Gay Parent?[edit]

• This article should either be titled working mother, or a sub-section should be added shining a light on the working father and possible obstacles/challenges they face.
• Insight on Homosexual parents, either in a relationship or not, would also be an interesting sub-section to research.

Structure[edit]

• Article flow is confusing, grammatically inconsistent and poorly structured. Working mothers could be broken down better.
• Motherhood Penalty section should come after historic viewpoints.

References[edit]

• Links do not all lead to proper source.
• Content in article missing numerous citations.
• Many sources written in a bias, subjective manner.

Beyond the initial paragraph, this is either a well-written piece about the history of household gender inequalities, or a highly biased agenda-driven piece about the history of working parents. Rather than attempt to re-write it in an appropriately impartial historical construct, it might be easier to simply change the title. Beldings (talk) 14:07, 7 November 2021 (UTC)beldings[reply]