This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the World Wide Fund for Nature article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This article is written in British English with Oxford spelling (colour, realize, organization, analyse; note that -ize is used instead of -ise) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 11, 2007 and September 11, 2008. |
the revenue listed in the article (€654 million (2013)), isn't sourced and there is a more recent financial statement listed already in the sources. this should be updated. Onit1234 (talk) 01:33, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Current title of the page is "World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)". But actual name of the organization is "World Wildlife Fund (WWF)". You can refer to their website https://www.worldwildlife.org/ Hence, kindly correct it.
Suresh M. 103.114.211.250 (talk) 15:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]