Contents

Talk:Xylospongium

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contents of the Tersorium page were merged into Xylospongium. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

There is no academic consensus that the sponge was used for wiping. Primary sources make no such claim and none clearly indicate such a use. This is largely an older assumption made without evidence, now peddled by lowbrow news sources simply because it sounds sensational. The current academic trend is to assume that it was used as exactly what it appears: a toilet brush. Please maintain neutral PoV and do not repeat sensational claims without evidence. The disagreement should be mentioned, but one interpretation should not be allowed to dominate the article. Please use reliable academic sources and not otherwise unsourced sensational news articles. -- Dantai Amakiir (talk) 10:33, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point to some sources regarding this? Because Google Scholar is bringing up several recent articles that claim it was a wiping brush.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 02:56, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see those sources when I do a search. I see several articles which state the toilet brush theory, but they all cite Wiplinger, who is already cited here. Feel free to add those citations you mention. All I care about is neutral PoV and that claims are correctly cited. Dantai Amakiir (talk) 19:36, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

InAnal cleansing, it claims that the Romans "used a sponge on the end of a stick to clean themselves after defecating, the stick being pushed through the hole in the front of the toilet" (which I can see in the photograph on this page. I'm going to assume it's referring the the xylospongium. Shouldn't it mention that some people believe this is the case? It just says that "one of the possible uses" is as a primitive toilet brush. What about the other possible use(s)? I'm also going to go back and add a link to this article in the other one. Personally, I think the other explanation makes more sense than the "toilet brush" one, based on the openings in the toilet bowls, but that's just my personal hunch. AnnaGoFast (talk) 04:13, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it. I got here from the toilet paper article and it also stated that these sticks were used for wiping the anus. This article seems to only imply that they were used for cleaning the toilet itself. Succubus MacAstaroth (talk) 12:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pass the shit stick 70.67.141.111 (talk) 03:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]