This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
I think the page is much better with the recently-removed sectional sub-dividers; that's why I added them. Who wants to read the page? People who want to know one specific thing about Yulon and people who want to know more about this Taiwanese company. The sub-dividers allow the page to better-cater to the former, and their ilk. Fleetham (talk) 21:22, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree. Over-dividing (with sections often consisting of a single sentence) breaks up the article into illegible chunks. Prose is preferred to bullet points. As usual I would like to refer you to WP:STYLE, but I'll also suggest checking out today's Random Good Article (Hurricane Ida (2009)). 52,708 bytes of info divided into fourteen sections. (Yulon Motor as you would prefer it consists of 12,109 bytes, divided into no less than 23 (!) sections) Then I suggest you read a few GA-rated articles to get a feel for the desirable style of Wikipedia articles. These are not my private inventions, it is me trying to contribute to good articles which conform to the overall style of Wikipedia. ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃ (talk) 21:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, okay then. Should we change the Lexile level as well? I target all my articles to something like 500L but perhaps an older audience prefers less sectional sub-dividing and a 1300L+ score? Fleetham (talk) 22:01, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know; I don't read good articles. But my guess is wikipedia usually has a Lexile count of less than 1300L. I didn't know about "simple English wikipedia"; it would be difficult to make sure I was writing simply. Fleetham (talk) 01:32, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am requesting that you do read a few good articles so as to get a handle on what you are expected to be doing. Lexile count is of no relevance here, particularly not your private target of 500. ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃ (talk) 06:32, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, but I think using the Taipei Times lead ref would be misleading because while, yes, Yulon now mainly manufacturers Nissans under license, the history section assertion is more broad. Using the Taipei ref could be a "red herring" type-fallacy. Fleetham (talk) 01:28, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but the citation in the lead can only support the claim that they have been doing so recently. So, it's unsuitable for the history section. Fleetham (talk) 01:47, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is not cited there. The fact that Yue Loong has, for four full decades, built nearly exclusively Nissan products is not in doubt. You yourself do not doubt it, nor does anyone else. I could easily find a reference (I guess I'll have to), but it is not necessary and only makes the article even less legible. ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃ (talk) 06:29, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I know I deleted a sentence that said many licensed, Yulon-made models bore a Yulon badge. But then you got a reference, which I assume supports that assertion. Fleetham (talk) 19:50, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Yulon. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified 3 external links on Yulon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified 2 external links on Yulon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
