Zambezi is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 1, 2005.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
The article states that the Zambezi is the 'largest' to flow into the Indian Ocean. I'm not sure what largest means here. If it means longest, this seems to be correct. But if it refers to average annual discharge, surely the Ganges River is larger?
I suggest that, for the sake of consistensy, we use the spelling Zambezi (most used English spelling) instead of Zambesi. --Ezeu19:32, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I also Think thats right to use the right spelling cause everyone always gets mixed up!!!
Notes: I see you're going for a single Notes/Refs section. Would it be better to have any numbered notes at the top of this, for findability?
I'd like to add a bit about Nyami nyami (god of the river, per the Tonga people). Where would you like this? Would it work to change "Exploration of the river" to something like "People and the river"?
Numbering of citations would definitely be good - I'll go through and add what I can. Might be a few days before I can though, probably won't have much computer access over the next couple of days. I do definitely prefer just a single reference section, if possible - you often see 'Notes' then 'References' sections but that means you have to follow two footnotes to get to the source of a fact rather than just one.
I put stuff about the Lozi people's relationship with the river in 'Upper river', so maybe info about Nyaminyami (which would certainly be an excellent addition) could go in 'Middle river'? (Tonga people inhabit the parts above the Kariba gorge, right?) Worldtraveller01:17, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Britannica states that the river rises near Kalene Hill. On the map Kalene Hill looks much closer to the sources than Mwinilunga, which is situated some 70 km southward, on West Lunga river (tributary of Zambezi). There is no info about Kalene Hill in the Wikipedia. Verdi116:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Are you aloud to change the web page cause everytime I try I always end up stuffing up my computer cause im a geogilist
xoxo Evie Witerfild —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.233.16.214 (talk) 00:48, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Tributaries: duplication of Wikipedia entries for those rivers
I suggest that the paragraphs on the tributaries be replaced by links to articles on each of those rivers, and details all be transferred to those pages. The article is quite long already, and could do with a few comments on the Zambezi basin as a whole and on the palaeogeographical history of the river. Does anyone object? Rexparry sydney05:29, 18 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As previously flagged and since there were no objections I have moved detailed text on the tributaries to articles on those rivers and replaced with the an oiverview of the Zambezi basin listing the rivers with some hydrological data, and including material on floods especially. Rexparry sydney06:53, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The figure given here was 7000 m³/s which is found in other references such as MSN Encarta and several websites. A figure of 4880 m³/s is given on the Rivers of the Earth website. However I have found two references, both hydrological works, giving figures either side of 3,400 m³/s and so I have amended to this figure and given the references. Possibly the figure of 7000 m³/s is the mean flow rate for March or April, ie when the river is in flood. The same thing happened with the Victoria Falls page - rainy season peak flow rate being used as an average figure. Rexparry sydney03:40, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We also have Nile, Danube, Rhine, Mekong. It's okay not to append "River" when there's really no confusion what you're talking about. It's commonly called just the Zambezi (and "Zambezi River" though certainly not incorrect sounds very odd). Also important to note is that there's no other significant Zambezis -- a different situation than, say, Mississippi, which would more likely be the US state. As with Nile, Danube, etc. I think the current name is appropriate. --JayHenry (talk) 00:19, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 2 external links on Zambezi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I have just modified 6 external links on Zambezi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
level-4 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
