Contents

Talk:Zarya (ISS module)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Zarya (ISS module) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 20, 2005, November 20, 2006, and November 20, 2007.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spaceflight: Space stations Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the space stations working group. Russia: Technology & engineering / Science & education High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force. This article is supported by the science and education in Russia task force. United States This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

On 28 April 2022, it was proposed that this article be movedtoZarya (ISS module). The result of the discussion was all moved.

does any one noe all of the 107 people that have been to the iss —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.227.125.130 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 9 June 2006

Check the various Space Station Mission lists. Athough a list that long wouldn't belong in this article. Jon 13:12, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it just me or is the wording on every single ISS related article implying that NASA is behind the ISS? As far as I know this is an international effort which NASA could not even start before Canada, Japan, Russia and Europe were involved for funding and expertise purposes. The core modules and the Space Station idea are both Russian as well so where is this NASA centrism coming from? Please, for gods sake, this is the first human international effort at space research and travel. KEEP IT NEUTRAL. Jenga3 (talk) 09:18, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Zarya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071009193814/http://space.kursknet.ru/cosmos/english/cargoes/pr1m4.shttohttp://space.kursknet.ru/cosmos/english/cargoes/pr1m4.sht

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Zarya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5ilAO9cCm?url=http://www.astronautix.com/craft/proessm1.htmtohttp://www.astronautix.com/craft/proessm1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the move request was: all moved. (non-admin closure) NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 21:02, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Zarya → Zarya (ISS module)
• Zarya (spacecraft) → Zarya (space capsule)
• Zarya (disambiguation) → Zarya

– There is no primary topic for this word. Pageviews show that this page and the Overwatch character get nearly equal pageviews on average. Either way, Zarya (spacecraft) is too vague for the article it is used on and should redirect to the disambiguation. Forgive me if I am wrong about the proper disambiguations as there are very few examples of two conflicting spacecraft; I am open to alternate suggestions. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 17:53, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support per nomination. There are 13 entries listed upon the Zarya (disambiguation) page, with no indication that the scientific and historical positioning of the ISS module is at such an elevated level in the English-speaking world that it overtakes the combined renown of the 12 remaining entries. As for Zarya (spacecraft) → Zarya (space capsule), the proposed form is more specific, while consisting of only two additional letters plus a space. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 15:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support  Solid argument. —Michael Z. 16:03, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support Zarya (Overwatch) gets more views (2,362) than the ISS module (2,170) though the ISS module probably has more long-term significance than the Overwatch character and the ISS module is also a spacecraft so the 2nd title is ambiguous. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Crouch, Swale: Zarya (Soviet spacecraft)orZarya (cancelled spacecraft) are probably the next best picks since I suppose technically the module can also be considered a space capsule. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I don't have much of an oppinion on what the qualified title is for the 2nd move just that the current one is ambiguous. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:29, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support all per nom, including retargeting the potentially ambiguous Zarya (spacecraft) to the disambiguation page. Steel1943 (talk) 18:25, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.