 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Information that Zhihua Si Temple is "the most intact wooden architectural complex of the Ming Dynasty in Beijing" at the Beijing Municipal Administration of Cultural Heritage website. Badagnani (talk) 21:49, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Additional source here.
This blanking of sourced information, by a new anonymous editor, is simply unacceptable, in light of the evidence presented. Please reverse yourself on this, thank you. Constructive edits are always welcomed, but destructive ones are not. Badagnani (talk) 21:51, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure if the article should mention that the music on "Buddhist Music of the Ming Dynasty (1993). JVC" is performed by staff from the Central Conversatory of Music.
There is also another recording, released by Wind Records of Taiwan. I think it was vol 9 from a series of those meditation/relaxation CDs. No performers are stated, it just said Zhihua temple music.
Both CDs (as mp3s) are available on the net somewhere.
LDHan (talk) 14:17, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Zhihua Temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to trueorfailed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
