This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Uh, has anyone noticed a missing ethnicity? Where are the famous European-Americans? I'm not willing to tackle a project that size, but I'm sure it can be done. Citizen Premier06:45, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
And, that would be a bad reason: Australian Americans links to "Australian American#Notable Australian Americans", Honduran links to "Honduran American", Trinidadian and Tobagonian links to "Trinidadian and Tobagonian American", Guatemalan and Peruvian are redlinks.
Now, the redlinks are gone. But if the non-lists can stay, there are many more in Template:Asian Americans, Template:European Americans, Template:West Indian Americans, Template:Hispanic and Latino Americans and Template:Arab Americans. Most of them have section list like this: Georgian Americans#Notable Georgian Americans and the above mentioned Australian article. 85.76.80.171 (talk) 02:50, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Separated "Cajun" from French. Not all Acadians (who migrants to Louisiana) expelled were of French descent. With this prior logic, "Louisiana Creole" should also be bracketed along side French as Louisiana-born Frenchman were Creoles, but not all Creoles were French either; some Spanish, Native American or African descent in the colonial colony. There is a grand confusion that all Creole descended peoples are black or of African descent and that the white French population of Louisiana are all Cajun; this is not true. See: Edgar Degas as an example. To argue further, when the tally of French spoken in the United States is conducted, French, Cajun French, andFrench Creole languages are included. So it's best to simply keep them separated in this list due to the former realization. Savvyjack23 (talk) 06:35, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings and felicitations. I, unfortunately, am not skilled enough in template makeup to implement this or to figure out which alternative template will do the job properly. My reason is exemplified in Tejanos#Notable people. Would someone please be so kind as to perform this edit? —DocWatson42 (talk) 22:28, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]