This template is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Other concerns: why don't we write their names in full? Moreover, should we also add acting DCIs? For example, McLaughlin should be in this list? @pple10:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(We've met before?) Anyway, they are two separate jobs. The DCI (who also ran the CIA) had broader responsibilities, even though he was colloquially referred to as the CIA Director, but that was never his actual title. That job was abolished by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004. The Act established the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, which is the job Hayden holds. (Goss held each position: before the Act he was DCI, after it he was CIA director.) I think it is important to be precise about these things.
(Yes, more than once) Understand your point. However, I think this category creator's main purpose was to list all people who took control over CIA, both DCIs and DCIAs even though the title Director of the CIA has only been given to Goss and Hayden so far. Instead of excluding Hayden, why don't we change to Directors of Central Intelligence and Directors of the Central Intelligence Agency for title and mark Goss with bold letters to make a distinction? Like this:
And come back to my further concerns. I don't like the way of listing only their family names. And what about John E. McLaughlin? Should he be listed here, too (though his tenure just lasted 2 months)? @pple14:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
John E. McLaughlin was Deputy DCI and for a time acting DCI; he was not a U.S. Senate confirmed DCI. He is a good man, but properly left off this list.
