Contents

Template talk:Formula One

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Formula One This template is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information. View the task list Discuss the project Help out with Portal:Formula OneFormula OneWikipedia:WikiProject Formula OneTemplate:WikiProject Formula OneFormula One articles

Portal link

[edit]

Should there be a link to Portal:Formula One in this template?--Midgrid(talk) 17:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any support for the idea of making the sections of this template collapsible? It's quite a long template and in most articles in which it's transcluded, it extends past the article lead and ends up causing a table of data to be horizontally "squeezed" (and hence artificially lengthened) for no good reason - see List of Formula One World Drivers' Champions as an example. (Of course, the degree of "squeeze" will depend on your screen resolution). If the template sections were collapsible, in most cases the template would fit within the lead section and the table could occupy the full page width. DH85868993 (talk) 08:33, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've been bold and made the change. Feel free to revert if you don't like it. DH85868993 (talk) 02:21, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Made some more color options. The present one look nice but on a softer side tough - excuse me if i am wrong. So made some more options that might look a little dynamic.Please leave yoiur comments. Race27 (talk) 09:26, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think the current version is better (more contrast for wp:accessibility. the blue on blue is especially bad in your examples. Frietjes (talk) 18:25, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I find the current colours preferable to all three alternatives presented. DH85868993 (talk) 21:57, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Should we convert this to a Navbox to be placed at the bottom of the page instead of at the right side as a sidebar? This "sidebar" is taking up too much space that it causes too much whitespace where pages with table are involved. StandNThrow (talk) 09:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

could be formatted to do both, see, e.g., {{Chabad}} which can function as either a sidebar or a navbox. Frietjes (talk) 17:08, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

or we could add back the collapsible lists aspect. Frietjes (talk) 17:10, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to see the collapsible lists restored. DH85868993 (talk) 21:51, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

done. Frietjes (talk) 18:49, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]