Contents

Template talk:Hawaii

	This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Hawaii This template is within the scope of WikiProject Hawaii, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hawaii on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HawaiiWikipedia:WikiProject HawaiiTemplate:WikiProject HawaiiHawaii articles

Finish harmonizing this template but it was really hard! (two down, 48 to go) BigBang11 15 March 2006 01:23 PST (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates lists and displays all 50 U.S. state (and additional other) templates. It potentially can be used for ideas and standardization. //MrD9 07:15, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding standardization of state templates (primarily regarding layout and styling) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. states/state templates. An effort was made earlier this year to standardize Canadian province templates (which mostly succeeded). Lovelac7 and I have already begun standardizing all state templates. If you have any concerns, they should be directed toward the discussion page for state template standardization. Thanks! — Webdinger ^{BLAH | SZ} 22:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering why Kaʻula wasn't on the the template. If small islands like Kahoolawe and the Gardner Pinnacles are present, why shouldn't Kaula be? -- VegitaU 23:45, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since Midway Atoll is not part of the State of Hawaii and is actually a separate jurisdiction, it should not be included in this US state template. I don't think this is splitting hairs: the State of Hawaii is a political entity, in contrast to the geographic distinction of Hawaiian Island. Thus, as Midway Atoll is under separate administration, it should not be included n the state's template. If this were a geographic template for the Hawaiian Islands, we'd want to include. I'm deleting. Goeverywhere 02:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This template has been the default color since 2009, and I see no reason to change it to a different color scheme. The bottom section of an article frequently has several navigation boxes, and using colors other than the default increases the chance of color clashes. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 17:16, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]