Contents

Template talk:Infobox academic

This template was considered for deletionon2020 March 19. The result of the discussion was "no consensus to merge".

This template was nominated for deletion or considered for merging. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Merge with Template:Infobox economist: no consensus, 12 June 2016, see discussion. No consensus, 29 February 2012, see discussion.

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This template is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This template is supported by the science and academia work group. Education This template is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles

Hi, I was wondering what people would think about adding ORCID numbers to this infobox? They are standarised unique numbers for individual authors and might help readers identify work better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamzze (talk • contribs) 19:14, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why the thesis link inside the {{Infobox academic}} template is not displaying correctly for Ty Seidule but seems to work when the {{Infobox academic}} template is embedded inside another template when used in Carol T. Christ. -- 64.202.138.67 (talk) 02:08, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The title and url were reversed. Fixed now. MB 03:44, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding my stupid error (which I should have spotted in the first place if I weren't tired at that time of the edit) and for also fixing the problem. -- 64.202.138.67 (talk) 21:25, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

When editing an article containing {{Infobox academic}} such as Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, we see errors stating Preview warning: Page using Template:Infobox person with unknown empty parameter "denomination", "salary", "weight" even if those parameters are not used in the article. Could someone please remove these unsupported parameters from {{Infobox academic}} to remove these errors? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 15:01, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Izno: Thank you for removing these (and many more) parameters! GoingBatty (talk) 15:28, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The contents of the academic_advisors field normally appear alongside the label "Academic advisors"; however, when the field is used alongside the doctoral_advisor field, it uses the label "Other academic advisors" with a non-breaking space after the word "Other". In most use cases, this has the unfortunate side effect of substantially increasing the width of the label column and decreasing the width of the content column. While the effect of this may seem minor in theory, in practice this frequently results in numerous additional line breaks in the infobox, substantially increasing the infobox's length.

To avoid this, I would suggest that rather than using the label "Other[ ]academic advisors" when the field is used alongside doctoral_advisor, we instead use the label "Other advisors" in such cases. As the field normally appears under the heading "Academic background", this label would be no less precise than the existing one. And the fact that we are referring specifically to academic advisors is further reinforced by the fact that the label would only appear when immediately followed by the doctoral_advisor field. 207.161.86.162 (talk) 04:12, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you show some examples of this problem? I finally found Thomas Nagel, where the two parameters are used together, but my browser does not show this problem in that case. P.I. Ellsworth - ed. ^put'r there 04:38, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Nagel was what prompted me to suggest this. It's far from the most extreme example I've seen, but I count the addition of seven line breaks^[a] and the loss of one line break (as the doctoral advisor label never needs to wrap when the academic advisors field is present) for a net addition of six line breaks. I've posted the infobox with and without the academic advisors field in the collapsed boxes below.

{{Infobox academic}} already has a tendency to be on the long side, so the addition of six lines makes a difference (and, in this case, amounts to a 16% increase in the number of lines in the infobox, excluding headings and the image). And the effect has been even more pronounced in articles I have come across in the past, particularly articles with a significant number of names in the influences and influenced fields.

With academic advisors field

Thomas Nagel Nagel in 1978 Born (1937-07-04) July 4, 1937 (age 87) Belgrade, Yugoslavia Nationality American Spouses Doris G. Blum ​ ​ (m. 1958; div. 1973)​ Anne Hollander ​ ​ (m. 1979; died 2014)​ Awards Balzan Prize (2008) Rolf Schock Prize (2008) Academic background Alma mater Cornell University Corpus Christi College, Oxford Harvard University Thesis Altruism (1963) Doctoral advisor John Rawls Other advisors J. L. Austin Academic work Discipline Philosophy Sub-discipline Epistemology ethics legal philosophy philosophy of mind political philosophy School or tradition Analytic philosophy Institutions New York University Princeton University University of California, Berkeley Doctoral students Marcelo Alegre [es] Rebecca Goldstein Shelly Kagan Samuel Scheffler Susan Wolf Notable works The Possibility of Altruism (1970) "What Is It Like to Be a Bat?" (1974) Mortal Questions (1979) The View from Nowhere (1986) Equality and Partiality (1991) The Last Word (1997) Mind and Cosmos (2012) Notable ideas Panpsychism[1][2] subjective character of experience what is it like to be a something References ^ Nagel, Thomas, 1979, "Panpsychism", in Nagel, Thomas (1979). Mortal questions. London: Canto. pp. 181–195. ^ Coleman, Sam (2018). "The Evolution of Nagel's Panpsychism" (PDF). Klesis. 41. Retrieved 19 September 2019.

Without academic advisors field

Thomas Nagel Nagel in 1978 Born (1937-07-04) July 4, 1937 (age 87) Belgrade, Yugoslavia Nationality American Spouses Doris G. Blum ​ ​ (m. 1958; div. 1973)​ Anne Hollander ​ ​ (m. 1979; died 2014)​ Awards Balzan Prize (2008) Rolf Schock Prize (2008) Academic background Alma mater Cornell University Corpus Christi College, Oxford Harvard University Thesis Altruism (1963) Doctoral advisor John Rawls Academic work Discipline Philosophy Sub-discipline Epistemology ethics legal philosophy philosophy of mind political philosophy School or tradition Analytic philosophy Institutions New York University Princeton University University of California, Berkeley Doctoral students Marcelo Alegre [es] Rebecca Goldstein Shelly Kagan Samuel Scheffler Susan Wolf Notable works The Possibility of Altruism (1970) "What Is It Like to Be a Bat?" (1974) Mortal Questions (1979) The View from Nowhere (1986) Equality and Partiality (1991) The Last Word (1997) Mind and Cosmos (2012) Notable ideas Panpsychism[1][2] subjective character of experience what is it like to be a something References ^ Nagel, Thomas, 1979, "Panpsychism", in Nagel, Thomas (1979). Mortal questions. London: Canto. pp. 181–195. ^ Coleman, Sam (2018). "The Evolution of Nagel's Panpsychism" (PDF). Klesis. 41. Retrieved 19 September 2019.

207.161.86.162 (talk) 05:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done: yes, I see that does make a difference. I made the change in the sandbox and then added Nagel's ibox to the testcases page. Made it easier to see the benefit in your edit. P.I. Ellsworth - ed. ^put'r there 07:59, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Paine Ellsworth!207.161.86.162 (talk) 08:04, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's my pleasure! Paine  08:17, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have almost emptied Pages using infobox academic with unknown parameters. The few remaining articles need |burial_place= and/or |resting_place=. Since this is a standard parameter of {{infobox person}}, it should be available for academics just like most other bios. FrietjesorJonesey (or anyone else), could you please add this. MB 03:44, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

okay, added. Frietjes (talk) 15:14, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant and related discussion at Template talk:Infobox scientist#Award parameter. Skjoldbro (talk) 16:32, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is better to added a parameter for the published books of an academician. Thanks, Hooman Mallahzadeh (talk) 16:10, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the sandbox, I have a version of the template that uses Module:Template wrapper, which allows any parameter in {{Infobox person}} to also be accepted here, while also accepting all existing parameters to this template. The downside is that all error checking is now handled by {{Infobox person}}, so parameter errors will show up in Category:Pages using infobox person with unknown parameters.

What do editors think? Should I make the sandbox template go live? — hike395 (talk) 05:27, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Done --- I fixed it so that errors will show up in Category:Pages using infobox academic with unknown parameters. — hike395 (talk) 13:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can H-index and Citation (as in citation count) parameters be added to this Infobox? KD HU (talk) 15:13, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Academic background divider is often a bit obstructive for the many articles which have no other info that fits under that section besides education/alma mater, so it ends up pushing the infobox downward and overall looks awkward. Some of the parameters are also confusing and appear contradictory — i.e., Thesis goes under academic background but is thus excluded from Academic work, which sort of implies that a person's thesis is not a part of their academic work.

I think it would be great to have the infobox take on a similar formatting as Template:Infobox scientist, and it will provide the additional benefit of providing some consistency to readers. For example, Template:Infobox scientist actually puts Thesis under Scientific career, which is appropriate, and doesn't have any sort of divider at all; it would be less of an eyesore/confusion if Template:Infobox academic did the same.

I've attempted to replicate an example of what an article would look like without that large infobox divider in the GA John Hart Ely. GuardianH (talk) 19:58, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]