 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
What's the purpose of this template? "For old stationary engines in museums, etc. Individual engines, not engine types."
What's a "museum"? This includes public galleries obviously, but what about privately preserved and inaccessible? What about "Still extant, but derelict" Is the Backbarrow Ironworks engine within scope? The Birmingham roundabout beam engines? The Severn Tunnel beam engines (one surviving beam left)?
What about engines that are completely lost, but that have a noteworthy history, such as Resolution?
What's "old"? Is there any limit? If it was worth preserving (see above), surely that's enough?
What's a "stationary engine"? Are stationary engines (which almost by definition of their collecting these days, are now portable for display) really the intention? Stationary steam engines are an obvious inclusion, but what about non-steam? What about the Pocket Power Station (a gas turbine electric generator) at the Internal Fire Museum? Waterwheels? Non-powered industrial structures such as pithead gear?
What does "working" mean? Doing paid work? Under steam in a museum? Moved mechanically in a museum? Capable of working, but not being used so as to help preservation (e.g. City of TruroorLion, although they're locomotives).
How does location work? Surely we would need at least two here: working and preserved. Some might even need to support a list of historical sites, without breaking the metadata generator.
I think this template ought to take a broad scope, and thus should avoid parameters being required (the broader the scope, the more cases where such a parameter becomes inappropriate). Particularly for the "obviously necessary" like a geographical location. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:20, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
