 | Template:Non-free video coverispermanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. This template does not have a testcases subpage. You can create the testcases subpage here. |
 | Fair use (inactive) | |||
| ||||
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please consider replacing the current code about To the uploader with
|below={{#ifeq:{{{image_has_rationale|{{{image has rationale}}}}}}|yes|<includeonly>[[Category:Non-free images with NFUR stated]]</includeonly>|{{imbox
| type = notice
| image = [[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|50px|alt=Attention|link=]]
| style = background:#d3edfd;
|text = '''To the uploader''':
# Please add a detailed '''[[Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline|fair use rationale]]''' for each use, as well as the '''source''' of the work and copyright information.
# This tag should only be used for video covers.
<br />''' To patrollers and administrators''': If this image has an 'appropriate' rationale please append <code><nowiki>|image has rationale=yes</nowiki></code> as a parameter to the license template.
}}<includeonly>[[Category:Non-free images for NFUR review]]</includeonly> }}
which enables the NFUR status to be tracked. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:46, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
but the big ones like book covers and so on still need to be done... I can;t edit these as I am not able to edit protected pages. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:45, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
As far as I can tell, the change to this template made by SchuminWeb on November 19 was never discussed, and thus there was no consensus for it established. This makes it a Bold edit. I would like to take the next step in WP:BRD and Revert it, but I cannot, since I am not an admin. Therefore I request that an admin revert SchuminWeb's edit of November 19. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:56, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Done. See discussion at User talk:SchuminWeb#Changes in the wording of "Non-free" templates. — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 10:38, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply] | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please update from the sandbox which moves {{Non-free media}} into the imbox, this allows license metadata to be properly emitted because the imbox is set to type license, which sets class licensetpl to the imbox, however {{Non-free media}} was not placed in the imbox so the metadata was not being detected. Dylsss(talk contribs) 23:25, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done Elli (talk | contribs) 08:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
