Contents

Template talk:Rotten Tomatoes

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rotten Tomatoes template.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Film This template is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Template:Rotten Tomatoesispermanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. Many titles were proposed and none seemed to have consensus. {{Rotten Tomatoes link}} was a late suggestion that did have decent support so I might suggest another RM with that proposed title. Galobtter (pingó mió) 21:36, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rotten Tomatoes → Template:Rotten Tomatoes External Link – Other templates exist, i.e. Template:Rotten Tomatoes prose, Template:Cite Rotten Tomatoes, Template:Rotten Tomatoes data, so shouldn't have one with just Rotten Tomateos Indagate (talk) 07:57, 27 March 2022 (UTC)— Relisting. No such user (talk) 10:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support Template:Rotten Tomatoes title per {{IMDb title}}, {{Hulu series}}, {{Disney+ series}}, etc. Gonnym (talk) 11:52, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just to be clear, I oppose the proposed title. Gonnym (talk) 20:16, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Support but not "title" because for {{IMDb title}}, "title" only exists to be distinct from {{IMDb name}}, and as far as I know, there are only IMDb external link templates. With Rotten Tomatoes, we have these inline templates. I think {{Rotten Tomatoes external link}} would be best, with {{Rotten Tomatoes External Link}} and {{Rotten Tomatoes EL}} redirecting to it. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 12:44, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support with proper capitalization, per Erik. --Quiz shows 18:15, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Support another title, but lukewarm on the proposed title. Opinions on {{Rotten Tomatoes ID}}? It literally uses the Wikidata property of the same name or asks the user to manually enter the ID per the template documentation. -2pou (talk) 02:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Courtesy pings since I'm a bit late to the topic @Indagate, Gonnym, Erik, and Quiz shows: -2pou (talk) 02:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Oppose to that as well. Category:Television external link templates and Category:Film external link templates should have more consistency in title usage. None of the templates use "id". Gonnym (talk) 04:15, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Agree that consistency in that category is important but think clarity among templates for Rotten Tomatoes is more important

  Oppose Rotten Tomatoes ID because not clear what it does, the other templates use the RT ID Indagate (talk) 08:36, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose: I don't agree there is a need to rename it just because there are other Rotten Tomatoes templates. However, since most are supporting this, I do agree with User:Erik that the words "External Link" should not be capitalized in the new template name. But instead of {{Rotten Tomatoes external link}}, how about {{Rotten Tomatoes link}}? That still differentiates it from the other RT templates and is short enough to eliminate the need for new redirects like {{Rotten Tomatoes EL}}. -- Zyxw (talk) 01:20, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  "Rotten Tomatoes link" sounds good good to me. —Joeyconnick (talk) 00:59, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  {{Rotten Tomatoes link}} sounds alright to me Indagate (talk) 19:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Template:Rotten and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 27#Template:Rotten until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Indagate (talk) 20:26, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IP 109... has started a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:External_links#Rotten_Tomatoes regarding whether this template should be used when RT is used as a citation Indagate (talk) 09:31, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered=or|ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hey, please copy change from sandbox. Have copied the allias' for the name parameter to the category detector as instances may be being missed from the category because of this. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 19:41, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:43, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Martin Indagate (talk) 09:16, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]