Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Themes  





2 Criticism  





3 See also  





4 References  














The Benedict Option






Hrvatski
 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


The Benedict Option
First edition
AuthorRod Dreher
LanguageEnglish
PublisherSentinel

Publication date

2017
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint
Pages304
ISBN978-0-735-21330-2

The Benedict Option: A Strategy for Christians in a Post-Christian Nation is a 2017 book by writer and conservative commentator Rod DreheronChristianity and Western culture. Drawing very loosely on the writings of early Christian monk Benedict of Nursia and the philosophy of Alasdair MacIntyre,[1] Dreher argues for the formation of virtuous Christian communities in response to an increasingly secular culture. The book produced discussion and debate in Christian and secular circles over the issues of cultural engagement and the direction of Christian communities.[2][3][4][5] Although Alasdair MacIntyre was claimed as an inspiration for the movement, MacIntyre has criticized it as politically conservative.[6]

Themes[edit]

The Benedict Option's title is taken from a quote by Alasdair MacIntyre in his book After Virtue in which he writes, "If the tradition of the virtues was able to survive the horrors of the last dark ages, we are not entirely without hope ... We are waiting not for a Godot, but for another—doubtless very different—St. Benedict."[7] The idea of a "Benedict option" involves finding the communities in which virtuous life can flourish, since Dreher argues that the existing culture has already forsaken the virtues. These communities are not necessarily physical in nature and do not necessitate migration to Christian centers of life, but do involve institutions such as churches, schools, and other organizations.[8]

The book's front jacket reads:

Today, a new post-Christian barbarism reigns. Many believers are blind to it, and their churches are too weak to resist. Politics offers little help in this spiritual crisis. What is needed is the Benedict Option, a strategy that draws on the authority of Scripture and the wisdom of the ancient church. The goal: to embrace exile from the mainstream culture and construct a resilient counterculture.

Criticism[edit]

Answering a question after delivering a keynote address at University of Notre Dame in 2017, Alasdair MacIntyre, who according to Dreher inspired the Benedict Option, responded critically to the latter. MacIntyre characterized the 'Benedict Option' as a politically conservative movement, while describing himself as neither conservative nor liberal. He said:[9]

The so-called 'Benedict Option' movement, insofar as it is inspired by anything do with me is inspired by one sentence I wrote, and the people who put it forward have apparently read nothing but that one sentence.

Explaining what he meant by that one sentence, MacIntyre stressed that it was only inadvertently that St. Benedict had founded a new social order. This new social order was largely independent of the feudal order because of a symbiotic relationship that developed between monasteries, which provided schooling and liturgy, and local communities, which provided novices, without which the order of monks would die out:[9]

This is not a withdrawal from society into isolation of a certain sort; this is actually the creation of a new set of social institutions that then proceed to evolve [...] So, when I said we need a new St. Benedict, I was suggesting we need a new kind of engagement with the social order, not any kind of withdrawal from it.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Thorngate, Steve, "Who is the Benedict Option For?". Christian Century, https://www.christiancentury.org/review/who-is-benedict-option-for
  • ^ Rothman, Joshua, "Rod Dreher's Monastic Vision". The New Yorker, https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/05/01/rod-drehers-monastic-vision
  • ^ Wax, Trevin, "The Benedict Option: Good Strategy, Bad Posture", The Gospel Coalition https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/trevin-wax/my-take-on-the-benedict-option-good-as-a-strategy-bad-as-a-posture/
  • ^ Green, Emma, "The Christian Retreat from Public Life", The Atlantic, https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/02/benedict-option/517290/
  • ^ "Welcome". The Benedict Option. Retrieved 2021-08-19.https://thebenedictoption.com/
  • ^ ""A NEW SET OF SOCIAL FORMS": ALASDAIR MACINTYRE ON THE "BENEDICT OPTION"". tradistae.com. Retrieved 26 September 2021.
  • ^ MacIntyre, After Virtue, p263. Notre Dame, 1981.
  • ^ Dreher, Rod, "Benedict Option FAQ", The American Conservative, https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/benedict-option-faq/
  • ^ a b ""A NEW SET OF SOCIAL FORMS": ALASDAIR MACINTYRE ON THE "BENEDICT OPTION"". tradistae.com. Retrieved 26 September 2021.

  • Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Benedict_Option&oldid=1228985885"

    Categories: 
    2017 non-fiction books
    Sentinel (publisher) books
    Hidden categories: 
    Articles with short description
    Short description with empty Wikidata description
    Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes from January 2021
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes
     



    This page was last edited on 14 June 2024, at 06:46 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki