 | |
| Type | Daily Newspaper |
|---|---|
| Format | Broadsheet |
| Publisher | Indian National Press Bombay Pvt. Ltd. |
| Editor-in-chief | G. L. Lakhotia |
| Associate editor | S. S. Dhawan |
| Founded | 1928 [1] |
| Language | English |
| Headquarters | Free Press House, Free Press Journal Marg, 215, Nariman Point, Mumbai 400021 |
| Circulation | 154,000 |
| Sister newspapers | Navshakti |
| Website | freepressjournal |
The Free Press Journal is an Indian English-language daily newspaper that was established in 1928 by Swaminathan Sadanand, who also acted as its first editor. First produced to complement a news agency, the Free Press of India, it was a supporter of the Independence movement. It is published in Mumbai, India.
The founder editor was Swaminathan Sadanand.[2] It was founded in 1928 to support Free Press of India, a news agency that dispatched "nationalist" news to its subscribers.[3] In the colonial context, Colaco describes it as "an independent newspaper supporting nationalist causes". She quotes Lakshmi[who?] as saying that "The nationalist press marched along with the freedom fighters".[4] It played a significant role in mobilising sympathetic public opinion during the independence movement.[5]
Among its founders was Stalin Srinivasan who founded Manikkodi in 1932. Bal Thackeray worked as a cartoonist for the newspaper until being removed from the job. Thackeray then founded Marmik.[6] According to Atkins he was removed "after a political dispute over Thackeray's attacks on southern Indian immigration into Bombay"[7] Notable cartoonist R. K. Laxman joined The Free Press Journal as a twenty-year-old. He was Thackeray's colleague. Three years into the job, he was asked by his proprietor not to make fun at communists, Laxman left and joined The Times of India.[8]
It supported the practice rights of Jewish doctors who had taken refuge in Mumbai fleeing persecution in Germany, in the 1930s. Indian doctors opposed their right to practice claiming that Germany did not have reciprocal arrangements for Indian doctors. The Free Press Journal argued that this was against the "ancient Indian traditions of affording shelter from persecution".[9]
