Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Scoops  



1.1  Sony laptop battery scandal  





1.2  Rydermark  





1.3  ATI Intel front side bus license revocation  





1.4  Windows 10 Technical Preview eavesdropping  







2 References  





3 External links  














The Inquirer







Русский
 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


The Inquirer
News, reviews, facts and friction

Type of site

Tech tabloid
Available inEnglish
Dissolved19 December 2019; 4 years ago (2019-12-19)
OwnerIncisive Media Ltd.
Created byMike Magee
EditorCarly Page
Key people
  • Lee Bell
  • Roland Moore-Colyer
  • Dave Neal
  • Chris Merriman
  • Alan Martin
  • CommercialYes
    RegistrationNo
    Launched2001; 23 years ago (2001)
    Current statusCeased publishing

    The Inquirer (stylized as TheINQUIRER) was a British technology tabloid website founded by Mike Magee after his departure from The Register (of which he was one of the founding members) in 2001. In 2006 the site was acquired by Dutch publisher Verenigde Nederlandse Uitgeverijen (VNU).[1] Mike Magee later left The Inquirer in February 2008 to work on the IT Examiner.

    Historically, the magazine was entirely Internet-based with its journalists living all over the world and filing copy online, though in recent years it has been edited from Incisive Media's offices in London.[2]

    Although traditionally a 'red top', under Incisive Media it has put more weight behind its journalism, reducing the number of jibes at companies, and moved instead towards sponsored online debates in association with high-profile organisations, most recently, Intel.[3]

    The Inquirer ceased publishing on 19 December 2019, partly due to declining digital advertising revenues.[4][5]

    Scoops[edit]

    Sony laptop battery scandal[edit]

    In 2006 The Inquirer reported laptop battery problems that affected Dell, Sony and Apple as of September 2006, with rumours of problems at Toshiba and Lenovo. In June 2006, The Inquirer published photographs of a Dell notebook PC bursting into flames at a conference in Japan;[6] The New York Times reprinted The Inquirer's photographs.[7] The Inquirer was also the first publication to report Dell's subsequent decision to recall faulty batteries, according to BusinessWeek.[8]

    The Inquirer's successful reporting of the story relied on information supplied by readers and later by a confidential source at Dell.『I attribute being on top of the story to old-fashioned print journalism standards – cultivating, and, if you'll excuse the pun, not burning such contacts,』The Inquirer's founder, Mike Magee, told BusinessWeek.[8]

    Rydermark[edit]

    In July 2006, The Inquirer posted images to show cheating by Nvidia Windows device drivers in Rydermark 2006.[9] The images were alleged to be fake by a number of sources.[10][11] The Inquirer denied any wrongdoing and quoted the maker of Rydermark calling the allegations against them "irresponsible".[12] About 8 months after the original Rydermark article, The Inquirer ran another article claiming that Rydermark was still being developed, but was near release.[13] In response, one of its critics offered $1,000 to a charity of the Rydermark articles author's choosing if he could produce (breaching his NDA) a version of Rydermark that showed the alleged screenshots in full-motion video before a set deadline (which gave the author 10 and a half hours, beginning at 6:30PM UK time). No one produced the program before the deadline passed.[14]

    Independent verification that RyderMark was genuine, first appeared in TweakTown in May 2007.[15] RyderMark developer Ajith Ram denied ever sending the Inquirer Nvidia cheating allegations.[16]

    ATI Intel front side bus license revocation[edit]

    On 24 July 2006, The Inquirer wrote that, in response to AMD's announced intent to purchase ATI, "ATI had its chipset license pulled, or at least not renewed by Intel."[17] ATI responded by stating that its license had not been revoked and that they continue to ship Intel chipsets under license.[18] On 23 August 2006, ATI showed its chipset roadmap to motherboard vendors which showed that next-generation chipsets for the Intel platform are cancelled.[19] On 1 March 2007, AMD said that they would continue developing chipsets for Intel platforms.[20]

    Windows 10 Technical Preview eavesdropping[edit]

    On 3 October 2014, The Inquirer reported on the privacy policy for the Technical Preview the upcoming Microsoft Windows 10 operating system.[21] In the report, it pointed out that the permissions included the ability for Microsoft to monitor individual keystrokes as well as file content from users. The story was picked up by news media around the world causing Microsoft to admit that monitoring was a necessary part of the process, but denying use of a keylogger.

    Ed Bott, writing for ZDNet, accused the site of being "a tech tabloid known for its breathless headlines and factually challenged prose" and said of writer Chris Merriman, "there's little evidence that the author has enough background in computer science or security to tell a keylogger from a key lime pie."[22]

    References[edit]

    1. ^ Bobbie Johnson (26 January 2006). "VNU buys into tabloid news". The Guardian.
  • ^ "All journalism will be Indian journalism one day". The Inquirer. 2 August 2006. Archived from the original on 30 August 2006. Retrieved 23 August 2006.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  • ^ "The Effect of the Internet of Things on User Privacy: Part 1". Intel. 12 May 2014. Retrieved 5 November 2014.
  • ^ "The INQUIRER reaches end-of-life". The Inquirer. 19 December 2019. Archived from the original on 19 December 2019. Retrieved 19 December 2019.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  • ^ Tobitt, Charlotte (19 December 2019). "Tech news website The Inquirer ceases publishing as ad revenues struggle despite 'healthy' audience". Press Gazette. Retrieved 20 December 2019.
  • ^ "Dell laptop explodes at Japanese conference". The Inquirer. 21 June 2006. Archived from the original on 5 July 2006. Retrieved 2 September 2006.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  • ^ Darlin, Damon (10 July 2006). "Dell's Exploding Computer and Other Image Problems". The New York Times.
  • ^ a b "The Battery Recall: A Win for the Web". BusinessWeek. 30 August 2006. Retrieved 2 September 2006.
  • ^ The Inquirer, 18 July 2006: Rydermark screenshots back California graphics fudge (cited 4 February 2007)
  • ^ DailyTech, 19 July 2006: "Rydermark" Cheating Allegations Discredited (cited 23 August 2006)
  • ^ Damien (19 July 2006). "The Inquirer accuses Nvidia of cheating". BeHardware. Retrieved 23 August 2006.
  • ^ The Inquirer, 19 July 2006: Rydermark maker labels hoax allegations 'irresponsible' (cited 23 August 2006)
  • ^ The Inquirer, 19 February 2007: Rydermark benchmark lives. It's almost done (cited 28 February 2007)
  • ^ Kristopher Kubicki. "DailyTech Digest: RyderMark, My take on RyderMark's newest incarnation".
  • ^ Lars Göran Nilsson (16 May 2007). "TweakTown: RyderMark Beta 2 Preview - Emerging competition for Futuremark?". TweakTown. Retrieved 17 May 2007.
  • ^ Kristopher Kubicki. "RyderMark Developer: We Never Said NVIDIA Cheated". DailyTech. Retrieved 11 June 2007.
  • ^ "Intel pulls ATI bus licence". The Inquirer. 24 July 2006. Archived from the original on 15 August 2006. Retrieved 23 August 2006.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  • ^ "AMD & ATI Answers to Rumormongering". H Enthusiast. 26 July 2006. Retrieved 23 August 2006.
  • ^ "News - Thursday, August 28, 2008". xbitlabs.com. Archived from the original on 29 August 2008.
  • ^ "AMD keeping open platform strategy: Q&A with sales and marketing vice president Jochen Polster". DigiTimes. 1 March 2007. Retrieved 3 March 2007.
  • ^ Chris Merriman (3 October 2014). "Microsoft's Windows 10 Preview has permission to watch your every move". The Inquirer. Archived from the original on 4 October 2014. Retrieved 5 November 2014.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: unfit URL (link)
  • ^ Ed Bott (23 October 2014). "Windows 10: You've Got Questions, I've Got Answers". The Ed Bott Report (blog). ZDNet. Retrieved 5 November 2014.
  • External links[edit]


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Inquirer&oldid=1233891344"

    Categories: 
    2001 establishments in the United Kingdom
    2019 disestablishments in the United Kingdom
    British news websites
    British technology news websites
    Computer magazines published in the United Kingdom
    Defunct magazines published in the United Kingdom
    Magazines established in 2001
    Magazines disestablished in 2019
    Magazines published in London
    Online magazines published in the United Kingdom
    Science and technology magazines published in the United Kingdom
    Technology websites
    Hidden categories: 
    CS1 maint: unfit URL
    Articles with short description
    Short description matches Wikidata
    Use dmy dates from January 2021
    Webarchive template wayback links
     



    This page was last edited on 11 July 2024, at 13:00 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki