Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 History  



1.1  International sales  







2 Design  



2.1  Animal rights  







3 Trademark disputes  





4 See also  





5 References  





6 External links  














Ugg boots






Azərbaycanca
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
Français

Italiano
Кыргызча
Nederlands
Norsk bokmål
Polski
Română
Русский
Slovenščina
Suomi
Svenska

 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




In other projects  



Wikimedia Commons
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


A pair of ugg boots

Ugg boots[1] are a unisex style of sheepskin boot originating in Australia. The boots are typically made of twin-faced sheepskin with fleece on the inside, a tanned outer surface and a synthetic sole. The term "ugg boots" originated in Australia, initially for utilitarian footwear worn for warmth, and which were often worn by surfers during the 1960s. In the 1970s, the boots were introduced to the surf culture of the United Kingdom and the United States. Sheepskin boots became a fashion trend in the U.S. in the late 1990s and a worldwide trend in the mid-2000s. In Australia, they are worn predominantly as slippers and often associated with daggy fashion sense and bogan culture.[2]

Prior legal disputes between some manufacturers of sheepskin boots arose as to distinguish whether "ugg" is a protected trademark, or a generic term and thus ineligible for trademark protection. There are more than 70 registered trademarks that include the term "ugg" in various logos and designs in Australia and New Zealand, as the term is considered a generic reference to a type of shoe.[3][4][5][6] Outside Australia and New Zealand, UGG is a brand manufactured by the California-based Deckers Outdoor Corporation, with most of its manufacturing based in China and with registered trademarks in over 130 countries worldwide including the US, UK, Canada, all European Union members, and China.[4][7] Despite the difference in capitalisation and pronunciation (e.g., yew-gee-gee[8] in China), Deckers Corporation actively asserts its "UGG" trade mark against Australian traders who sell their "ugg boots" overseas.[9]

Noteworthy manufacturers in Australia and New Zealand are EMU Australia, Uggs-N-Rugs and Ugg Australia.[10] While Deckers is often referred to as the leading manufacturer of the footwear style outside Australia,[11] Deckers refers to its boots as the "UGG-brand" boot, and associates it with a "California lifestyle".[12] Following an investigation by the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission into allegedly misleading and deceptive use of "Australia" in its branding, Deckers has rebranded from "UGG Australia" to "UGG".[13]

History[edit]

Cutting boot pieces from a sheepskin using a cutting press
Stitching the innersole of an Australian ugg boot

There are different claims to the origins of the ugg boot style. Artisanal sheepskin boots were known in rural Australia during the 1920s,[14] and were reportedly worn by shearers as they found them resistant to wool yolk (lanolin), which would rot their ordinary boots. However, when commercial manufacturing began remains unclear. The boots were reportedly being manufactured in 1933 by Blue Mountains Ugg Boots of New South Wales.[15] Frank Mortel of Mortels Sheepskin Factory has stated that he began manufacturing the boots in the late 1950s.[16][17] Surfer Shane Stedman of Australia has stated in interviews that he invented the ugg boot.[18] Perth sheepskin boot manufacturers Bruce and Bronwyn McDougall of Uggs-N-Rugs have manufactured the boots since the late 1970s.[19]

The origin of the term "ugg" is also unclear. Stedman registered the trademark "UGH-BOOTS" in Australia in 1971, and in 1982 registered the "UGH" trademark.[20] Frank Mortel claims that he named his company's sheepskin boots "ugg boots" in 1958 after his wife commented that the first pair he made were "ugly."[21][22][17] Some accounts have suggested that the term grew out of earlier variations, such as the "fug boots" worn by Royal Air Force pilots during World War I.[23]

The 1970s saw the emergence of advertising using the UGG[24] and UGH[25] terms both in trade names and as a generic term in Australia.[1] The Macquarie Dictionary of the Australian language first included a definition for "ugg boot" as a generic term for sheepskin boots in its 1981 edition.[19] (After Stedman complained to the editors of Macquarie, subsequent editions indicated that "UGH" was a trade mark.)[1]

In the 1970s, ugg boots became popular among competitive surfers.[19][22][26] Sheepskin footwear accounts for around 10 percent of footwear production in Australia.[27]

International sales[edit]

Surfing helped popularise the boots outside Australia and New Zealand. Advertisements for Australian sheepskin boots first appeared in Californian surf magazines in 1970.[28] By the mid-1970s, several surf shops in Santa Cruz, California and the San Fernando Valley were selling a limited number of boots purchased by the shops' owners while visiting surfing events in Australia.[29] In 1978, a Western Australian manufacturer of sheepskin boots, Country Leather, advertised outside Australia for distributors to sell its sheepskin boots, which were made from sheepskin sourced from Jackson's TanneryinGeelong, Victoria.[29] Seeing the popularity of the boots among American surfers, Australian surfer Brian Smith, then living in Santa Monica, California, and colleague Doug Jensen bought boots from Country Leather but were unhappy with the brand and decided to register UGG as their own trademark. Family friends invested $20,000 into the new venture and the group set up Ugg Imports.[29] Due to other business commitments, in 1979 Jensen handed over his share of the company to Smith. In 1987 Smith registered Ugg Holdings Inc. and in 1985 registered a U.S. trademark on a ram's head logo with the words "Original UGG Boot UGG Australia." In 1995, Ugg Holdings purchased Stedman's various trademarks.[29] As for the ugg name, Smith stated: "We always called them uggs, long before it was trademarked."[30]

Shoe manufacturer Hide & Feet in Newquay, England began manufacturing sheepskin boots in 1973, and in 1990 Nick Whitworth and his wife Kath bought the business and registered "UGG" as a trade mark in the UK. Due to increasing popularity and sales, in 1991 the company changed its name to "The Original Ugg Co." In 1999, Whitworth sold the company name and the British UGG trade mark to Deckers Outdoor Corporation, renaming his company the Celtic Sheepskin Company.[31]

By 1994, UGG boots had grown in status among surfers in California with 80% of sales in southern Orange County where Ugg Holdings saw an increase in sales of 60 percent on the previous season. Smith's UGG boots gained international exposure when they were worn by the United States Olympic teaminLillehammer for the 1994 Winter Olympics.[32] Australian manufacturers also saw an increase in exports of sheepskin boots to the United States, although Ugg Holdings retained an estimated 80% market share. By the end of the year, Country Leather had opened its own shop in Redondo Beach to promote an expansion of the brand from its established surf market into mainstream footwear sales and Ugg Holdings began sourcing UGG boots directly from Jackson's Tannery, which had changed its name to EMU Australia.[27][33] In early 1995, Smith promoted the UGG AUSTRALIA brand on the Rush Limbaugh show, which spurred sales while the brand gained further exposure when the San Diego Chargers started wearing them. According to retailers, it was not just the footwear that attracted consumers, but the "made in Australia" tie-in as the boots were a unique product only available from Australia and Australian products were at that time very popular.[27][32] In August 1995, Smith sold Ugg Holdings to Deckers Outdoor Corporation for $14.6 million.[28][34][35] In 1996 Deckers registered the various trademarks for "UGG" in the U.S.[5][36]

Australian ugg boots are not considered fashionable in their countries of origin and are worn for warmth and comfort.[28] Ugg boots in Australia are worn predominantly as slippers and associated with daggy fashion sense, bogan behaviour and the outer suburbs when worn in public.[2][37][38][39] According to Australian fashion stylist Justin Craig: "The only people who get away with wearing them are models, who give out the message: 'I'm so beautiful, I can look good in any crap.'"[30] The Deckers UGG brand emerged as a fashion trend in the US through Deckers' actions to promote it as a high fashion brand.[11][40] Deckers solicited endorsements from celebrities such as Kate Hudson, Sarah Jessica Parker,[30][41] Cameron Diaz, Leonardo DiCaprio and Jennifer Lopez,[42] and product placements in television series such as Sex and the City, and films such as Raising Helen.[28][43] This marketing campaign "led to an exponential growth in the brand's popularity and recognizability."[44] The company reported US$689 million in UGG sales in 2008,[34] almost a 50-fold increase from 1995.[35] Deckers aggressively pursues sales of ugg boots by Australian traders overseas.[45][46] In 2010, worldwide sales of ugg boots by Australian manufacturers combined equalled only 5.9% of Deckers "UGG"-branded sheepskin boots sales,[11] with UGG dominating the world market.[40]

Design[edit]

Fashion ugg boots

Traditional Australian ugg boots are made from sheepskins with fleece attached. The fleece is tanned into the leather and the boot is assembled with the fleece on the inside. Some ugg boots have a synthetic sole, commonly made from Ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA). The stitching is often prominent on the outside of the boot. The natural insulative properties of sheepskin gives isothermal properties to the boots: the thick fleecy fibres on the inner part of the boots wick moisture and allow air to circulate, keeping the feet at body temperature[47] and allowing the boots to keep feet warm in cold weather and cool in hot weather.[48] Produced by a number of manufacturers, they come in a variety of colours, including black, pink, blue, chestnut, and fuchsia.[49] They are available in both pull-on and lace-up varieties and their height can range from just above the ankle to above the knee.[49]

Some variations of ugg style boots have also been made from kangaroo fur and leather. There are also synthetic boots. Although derided as "fake" by some in the industry, their lower price made them appealing to large retail chains such as Myer.[50]

Animal rights[edit]

Sheep-skin is a by-product of processing sheep for human consumption. That is, sheep are not specifically killed for their skins. Because it is a by-product, the supply of sheep-skin is limited by the number of sheep processed for the meat industry. The rise in the popularity of "UGG"-branded ugg boots has been the "driving force" in recent shortages, which have seen sheep-skin prices from 2010 to 2012 increase by up to 80%.[51]

As one of many clothing products made from animal skin, sheepskin boots have been the subject of criticism by the animal rights movement, and producers have responded by improving animal welfare.[52] Animal rights groups call for the boycott of sheepskin boots and their replacement with synthetic alternatives.[53] In 2007, Pamela Anderson, realizing that the boots were made of skin, called for a boycott on her website.[54] In February 2008, the Princeton Animal Welfare Society staged a campus protest against the fur industry, particularly attacking the sheepskin boot industry.[55]

Trademark disputes[edit]

The trademarking of the UGG name has been the subject of dispute in several countries. Deckers Outdoor Corporation has won disputes in the United States,[44] the Netherlands,[56] and Turkey.[7] In Australia and New Zealand, ugg is a generic term. The trademark for "Ugh-Boots" has been removed from the trademark registry for non-use.[4] Outside Australia and New Zealand, UGG (written in capital letters) is a registered trademarkofDeckers Outdoor Corporation.[44]

The first trademark application for UGG in the United States was filed by Brian Smith's company in 1984.[57] In the 1990s, Smith and then Deckers secured additional registrations in the U.S. and other countries.[5][36] In 1999, Deckers began asserting its new trademark and sent out cease and desist letters to Australian manufacturers that were selling sheepskin boots outside of Australia via the internet.[4] By the early 2000s, demand for UGG boots was soaring with Australian and U.S.-based manufacturers selling sheepskin boots over the Internet. There was confusion among consumers between generic ugg boots made in Australia and Deckers' UGG brand boots. Deckers' law firm Middletons of Melbourne began a serious effort to halt the Australian companies' sales[4] by sending cease and desist letters to a number of Australian and U.S.-based manufacturers, preventing them from selling sheepskin boots using the UGG trademark on eBay or from using the word in their registered business names or domain names.[50][58] Deckers initiated numerous domain name actions under the UDRP.[59][60]

In response to these actions by Deckers, some Australian manufacturers formed the Australian Sheepskin Association to fight the corporation's claim, arguing that "ugg" is a generic term referring to flat-heeled, pull-on sheepskin boots. One of these manufacturers, Perth's Uggs-N-Rugs, who had been manufacturing ugg boots since 1978 and selling them online since 1996, appealed to Australian trademark regulators.[4] The officer who heard the case stated that the "evidence overwhelmingly supports the proposition that the terms (ugg, ugh and ug boots) are interchangeably used to describe a specific style of sheepskin boot and are the first and most natural way in which to describe these goods." In 2006 Uggs-N-Rugs won the right to use the term UGG BOOT/S and variations such as UGH BOOT/S within Australia.[4] Deckers retained the trademark rights to their UGG logo in Australia as trademark protection only applies to the way the mark appears in its entirety and not the words it contains. IP Australia also ruled that the trademark "UGH-boots" (with hyphen) should be removed from the trademark register for non-use as Deckers had only been using the UGG logo, not the UGH marks.[4][5] This 2006 ruling applies only in Australia and Deckers still owns the trademarks in other jurisdictions such as the US, China, Japan and the European Union.[4]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c Thompson, Ian. "Decision of a Delegate of the Registrar of Trade Marks with Reasons" (PDF). 16 January 2006. IP Australia. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 July 2008. Retrieved 20 January 2015.
  • ^ a b "The uggly side of life". The Age. 27 September 2006.
  • ^ Kell, John (9 December 2010). "Emu Australia amused by Deckers lawsuit over 'ugg', 'ugg boot' trademarks". The Australian. Retrieved 26 April 2016.
  • ^ a b c d e f g h i Marks, Kathy (18 January 2006). "Ugg: How a minnow put the boot into a fashion giant". The Independent. Archived from the original on 5 June 2008. Retrieved 26 August 2010.
  • ^ a b c d The battle of the UGG BOOT continues Hynes Lawyers 11 February 2011
  • ^ Trade Marks Hearings 16 January 2006. Decision of a delegate of the registrar of trade marks with reasons. Pg 10
  • ^ a b Website of Walker Morris UK solicitors firm, Leeds. Archived 31 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine "Legal Briefing from the Trade Marks and Designs Group, 3 October 2011."
  • ^ Marisa Meltzer (30 March 2016). "Ugg: the look that refused to die". The Guardian. Retrieved 10 May 2021.
  • ^ Australian ugg boot maker loses appeal against US giant Deckers ABC News
  • ^ "The Australian Made Campaign: Ugg Australia". australianmade.com.au. Retrieved 18 December 2020.
  • ^ a b c Davis, Jim (27 December 2011). "Ugg kicking it in the U.S." Peoria Journal Star. Retrieved 17 June 2014.
  • ^ Deckers – Footwear brands
  • ^ Battle to use the term 'ugg boots' continues in US court Sydney Morning Herald 3 May 2017
  • ^ Terry, Andrew; Forrest, Heather (2008). "Where's the Beef? Why Burger King Is Hungry Jack's in Australia and Other Complications in Building a Global Franchise Brand". Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 2008. 28 (2): 188. ISSN 0196-3228.
  • ^ Gee, Steve (23 January 2004). "Uggly Americans — The Yanks steal another one of our beaut ideas". Daily Telegraph. Sydney, Australia. p. 7.
  • ^ "What's in a name?". Central Coast Express. Sydney, Australia. 9 March 2004. p. 20.
  • ^ a b Marks, Kathy (19 January 2006). "These boots are made for litigation". New Zealand Herald. Auckland, New Zealand. p. 33. Retrieved 18 November 2009.
  • ^ "Ugg inventor Shane Stedman happy to trade dollars for surf". News.com.au, originally reported by Sydney Morning Herald. 15 February 2011. Retrieved 5 September 2012.
  • ^ a b c "The Good, the Bad and the Ugg Boot". 2006. Australian Screen, National Film and Sound Archive. Retrieved 5 September 2012.
  • ^ IP Australia Ugg Boot Fact Sheet, Government of Australia, IP Australia, 2006
  • ^ Hansard transcript House of Representatives 17 February 2004
  • ^ a b Marks, Kathy (17 February 2004). "There's no business like shoe business". The Independent. London, United Kingdom. Retrieved 17 November 2009.
  • ^ "What's in a name?". Central Coast Express. 9 March 2004. p. 20.
  • ^ Canberra Times, 10 December 1971
  • ^ Canberra Times, 25 February 1972
  • ^ Burgess, Dave (12 July 2008). "An ugg boot is an ug boot is an ugh boot". The Dominion Post. Wellington, New Zealand. p. A17.
  • ^ a b c McAllister, Robert The Aussie invasion. Australian footwear manufacturers export to the U.S. Footwear News Condé Nast 6 February 1995
  • ^ a b c d "Behind the Brand: The Golden Fleece". The Wall Street Journal, 9 September 2010.
  • ^ a b c d Brian Smith. "Booty Call", Los Angeles Magazine, 1 October 2001, page 75
  • ^ a b c From Ugg to uglier The Daily Telegraph 29 February 2004
  • ^ "Our History". Celtic Sheepskin Co. Retrieved 20 January 2015.
  • ^ a b Foster, Caryl Ugg's going mainstream with slimmer boots Footwear News Condé Nast 14 February 1994
  • ^ Cronin, Emily The story of Ugg The Daily Telegraph 30 January 2011
  • ^ a b Abkowitz, Alyssa (19 August 2009). "Deckers finds its footing with Uggs". Fortune Magazine. Retrieved 25 August 2010.
  • ^ a b "Deckers Outdoor completes acquisition of UGG Holdings (Press release)". Business Wire. Retrieved 25 August 2010.
  • ^ a b Fink, Karl V.; Johnson, Carolyn M.; Miranda, David P. (5 February 2004), "UGG Holdings, Inc. and Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Paul Barclay d/b/a Australian Made Goods", National Arbitration Forum. Retrieved 25 August 2010
  • ^ The boganvillea is flowering and the hats are on the Kat The Age 23 June 2011
  • ^ Living east of Boganville? Madrigal Communications 27 October 2011
  • ^ Albion Park: home of the giant ugg boot? Illawarra Mercury 5 September 2009
  • ^ a b Bhasin, Kim (3 March 2014). "Why Ugg Boots Will Never Go Away". Huffington Post. Retrieved 30 June 2014.
  • ^ Brown, Suzanne S. (21 December 2003) "Ooh, so comfy, but ugh! so hard to find". Chicago Tribune, p. 7B.
  • ^ "Aus weichem Wildleder mit Butter". Cernotazi, 3 November 2012. Accessed 26 March 2013.
  • ^ Silverstein, Barry. BrandChannel.com "UGG Australia: the good, the bad, and the UGGly." Archived 9 October 2012 at the Wayback Machine, 10 December 2007. Accessed 26 March 2013.
  • ^ a b c "United States District Court UGG Holdings, Inc. -v- Clifford Severen et al" (PDF). Deckers Outdoor Corporation. 23 February 2005. Retrieved 12 February 2013.
  • ^ "Ugg: The battle over an iconic Australian boot", BBC News, 17 October 2017
  • ^ "Battle to use the term 'ugg boots' continues in US court", Sydney Morning Herald, 3 May 2017
  • ^ Grant, Lorrie (10 December 2003). "UGG boots a fashion kick". USA Today. Retrieved 17 November 2009.
  • ^ Julie Neigher (20 December 2009). "It looks like Ugg love". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 19 June 2010.
  • ^ a b Plant, Simon (22 February 2007). "Shake your booty". Herald Sun. Melbourne, Australia. p. W22.
  • ^ a b Needham, Kirsty (13 March 2004). "Putting the boot in". The Sydney Morning Herald. Sydney, Australia. p. 33. Retrieved 17 November 2009.
  • ^ Sheepskin and Shearling Frequently asked Questions Shepherd's Flock
  • ^ "Animal Welfare FAQ". UGG Australia. Retrieved 4 February 2016.
  • ^ Pledge Never to Wear UGGs! PETA 2015
  • ^ "Pamela Anderson Learns Ugg Boots Made From Sheepskin, Speaks Out Against Them". Fox News. 28 February 2007. Retrieved 14 May 2010.
  • ^ ""PAWS takes aim at Ugg boots". Daily Princetonian. 25 February 2008.
  • ^ "Verdict: Case number / Docket number: 74950 / HA ZA 08-2234" (in Dutch). Court Dordrecht. 24 December 2008.
  • ^ "U.S. Serial No. 73492075". USPTO. 27 June 1984. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  • ^ Arnold, James (19 February 2004). "Aussie boot battle takes an Uggly turn". BBC News. Retrieved 23 August 2010.
  • ^ "UGG Holdings, Inc. and Deckers Outdoor Corporation v. Paul Barclay d/b/a Australian Made Goods". National Arbitration Forum. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  • ^ "Previous cases". Nominet. Retrieved 22 September 2015.
  • External links[edit]


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ugg_boots&oldid=1220384028"

    Categories: 
    20th-century fashion
    Boots
    Australian clothing
    Australian inventions
    New Zealand fashion
    2000s fashion
    2010s fashion
    Hidden categories: 
    Webarchive template wayback links
    CS1 Dutch-language sources (nl)
    Articles with short description
    Short description is different from Wikidata
    Use British English from May 2012
    Use dmy dates from January 2020
    Commons category link is on Wikidata
     



    This page was last edited on 23 April 2024, at 13:28 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki