Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Reactor designations  





2 History  





3 Power plants  





4 See also  





5 References  





6 External links  














United States naval reactors






العربية
Français
Bahasa Indonesia
 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 





Coordinates: 46°3354.8N 119°3109.7W / 46.565222°N 119.519361°W / 46.565222; -119.519361
 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


46°33′54.8″N 119°31′09.7″W / 46.565222°N 119.519361°W / 46.565222; -119.519361

The Naval Reactor Disposal Site, Trench 94 200 Area East Hanford SiteinBenton County in the U.S. state of Washington, in November 2009. Stored Reactor Compartment Packages of pre-Los Angeles class, Los Angeles class, and cruisers.

United States naval reactors are nuclear reactors used by the United States Navy aboard certain ships to generate the steam used to produce power for propulsion, electric power, catapulting airplanes in aircraft carriers, and a few more minor uses. Such naval nuclear reactors have a complete power plant associated with them. All commissioned U.S. Navy submarines and supercarriers built since 1975 are nuclear powered, with the last conventional carrier, USS Kitty Hawk, being decommissioned in May 2009. The U.S. Navy also had nine nuclear-powered cruisers with such reactors, but they have since been decommissioned as well.

Reactors are designed by a variety of contractors,[who?] then developed and tested at one of several Department of Energy-owned and prime contractor-operated facilities: Bettis Atomic Power LaboratoryinWest Mifflin, Pennsylvania and its associated Naval Reactors FacilityinIdaho, and Knolls Atomic Power LaboratoryinNiskayuna, New York and its associated Kesselring site in West Milton, New York, all under the management of the office of Naval Reactors. Sometimes there were full-scale nuclear-powered prototype plants built at the Naval Reactors Facility, Kesselring, and Windsor (inConnecticut) to test the nuclear plants, which were operated for years to train nuclear-qualified sailors.

Reactor designations[edit]

Each reactor design is given a three-character designation consisting of:

For example, a S9G reactor represents a submarine (S), ninth-generation (9), General Electric designed reactor (G).

History[edit]

Conceptual analysis of nuclear marine propulsion started in the 1940s. Research on developing nuclear reactors for the Navy was done at Bettis Atomic Power LaboratoryinWest Mifflin, Pennsylvania starting in 1948. Under the long-term leadership of Admiral Hyman G. Rickover, the first test reactor plant, a prototype referred to as S1W, started up in U.S. in 1953 at the Naval Reactors FacilityinIdaho. Bettis Laboratory and Naval Reactors Facility were operated initially and for many decades afterwards by Westinghouse. The first nuclear-powered vessel, the submarine USS Nautilus, put to sea in 1955. USS Nautilus marked the beginning of the transition of submarines from relatively slow and short-ranged conventional submarines to ones capable of sustaining 20–25 knots (37–46 km/h; 23–29 mph) submerged for weeks on end.

Much of the early development work on naval reactors was done at the Naval Reactors Facility on the campus of the Idaho National Laboratory (INL, previously INEL). USS Nautilus was powered by the S2W reactor, and crew were trained on the land-based S1W reactor at INL.

The second nuclear submarine was USS Seawolf, which was initially powered by a sodium-cooled S2G reactor, and supported by the land-based S1G reactor at the Kesselring site under Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory operated by General Electric. A spare S2G was also built but never used.

USS Seawolf was plagued by superheater problems, with the result that USS Nautilus delivered far superior performance. This and the risks posed by liquid sodium in the event of an accident at sea led Admiral Rickover to select the pressurized water reactor (PWR) as the standard U.S. naval reactor type. The S2G was removed from USS Seawolf and replaced by the S2Wa reactor, using components from the spare S2W that was part of the USS Nautilus program. All subsequent U.S. naval reactors have been PWRs, while the Soviet Navy used mainly PWRs, but also used lead-bismuth cooled liquid metal cooled reactors (LMFR) of three types in eight submarines: K-27 and the seven-member Alfa class.

Experience with USS Nautilus led to the parallel development of further (Skate-class) submarines, powered by single reactors, and an aircraft carrier, USS Enterprise, powered by eight A2W reactor units in 1960. A cruiser, USS Long Beach, followed in 1961 and was powered by two C1W reactor units. USS Enterprise remained in service for over 50 years, and was inactivated in 2012.

Full-scale land-based prototype plants in Idaho, New York, and Connecticut preceded development of several types (generations) of U.S. naval nuclear reactors, although not all of them. After initial construction, some engineering testing was done and the prototypes were used to train nuclear-qualified sailors for many years afterwards. For example, the A1W prototype at Naval Reactors Facility led to development of A2W reactors used in USS Enterprise. By 1962, the US Navy had 26 nuclear submarines operational and 30 under construction. Nuclear power had revolutionized the U.S. Navy.

The technology was shared with the United Kingdom, while technological development in France, China and the Soviet Union proceeded separately.

After the Skate-class vessels, reactor development proceeded and in the U.S. a single series of standardized designs was built by both Westinghouse and General Electric, with one reactor powering each vessel. Rolls-Royce built similar units as the PWR1 for Royal Navy submarines and then developed the design further to the PWR2. Numerous submarines with an S5W reactor plant were built.

At the end of the Cold War in 1989, there were over 400 nuclear-powered submarines operational or being built. Some 250 of these submarines have now been scrapped and some on order canceled, due to weapons reduction programs. The Russian Navy and United States Navy had over one hundred each, with the United Kingdom and France less than twenty each and China six. The total today is about 160.

The United States is the main navy with nuclear-powered aircraft carriers (10), while Russia has nuclear-powered cruisers. Russia has eight nuclear icebreakers in service or building. Since its inception in 1948, the U.S. Navy nuclear program has developed 27 different plant designs, installed them in 210 nuclear-powered ships, taken 500 reactor cores into operation, and accumulated over 5,400 reactor years of operation and 128,000,000 miles safely steamed. Additionally, 98 nuclear submarines and six nuclear cruisers have been recycled. The U.S. Navy has never disclosed a reactor accident,[1][2] but has suffered at least one coolant loss accident, on the USS Guardfish.[3]

All nine of the U.S. Navy nuclear-powered cruisers (CGN) have now been stricken from the Naval Vessel Register, and those not already scrapped by recycling are scheduled to be recycled. While reactor accidents have not sunk any U.S. Navy ships or submarines, two nuclear-powered submarines, USS Thresher and USS Scorpion were lost at sea. The condition of these reactors has not been publicly released, although both wrecks have been investigated by Robert Ballard on behalf of the Navy using remotely operated vehicles (ROVs).[citation needed]

Congress has mandated that the U.S. Navy consider nuclear power as an option on all large surface combatants (cruisers, destroyers) and amphibious assault ships. If proven cost-effective in a life cycle cost analysis during the Analysis of Alternatives (AoA) phase of preliminary ship design, new ship classes (e.g. CG(X)) could proceed with nuclear propulsion.

Power plants[edit]

Current U.S. naval reactors are all pressurized water reactors,[4] which are identical to PWR commercial reactors producing electricity, except that:

Long core life is enabled by high uranium enrichment and by incorporating a "burnable neutron poison", which is progressively depleted as non-burnable poisons like fission products and actinides accumulate. The loss of burnable poison counterbalances the creation of non-burnable poisons and result in stable long term fuel efficiency.

Long-term integrity of the compact reactor pressure vessel is maintained by providing an internal neutron shield. (This is in contrast to early Soviet civil PWR designs where embrittlement occurs due to neutron bombardment of a very narrow pressure vessel.)

Reactor sizes range up to ~500 MWt (about 165 MWe) in the larger submarines and surface ships. The French Rubis-class submarines have a 48 MW reactor that needs no refueling for 30 years.

The nuclear navies of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Russian Federation rely on steam turbine propulsion. Those of the French and Chinese use the turbine to generate electricity for propulsion. Most Russian submarines as well as all U.S. surface ships since Enterprise are powered by two or more reactors. U.S., British, French, Chinese and Indian submarines are powered by one.

Decommissioning nuclear-powered submarines has become a major task for American and Russian navies.[6] After defuelling, U.S. practice is to cut the reactor section from the vessel for disposal in shallow land burial as low-level waste (see the Ship-Submarine Recycling Program).

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "NASA/Navy Benchmarking Exchange – Naval Reactors Safety Assurance Progress Report – July 15, 2003" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 October 2022. Retrieved 30 May 2008.
  • ^ "Fleet Size". Naval Vessel Register. United States Navy. Archived from the original on 14 January 2016. Retrieved 23 May 2008.
  • ^ Report: Nuclear sub suffers accident off Oregon in 1973
  • ^ "Fact Sheet on U.S. Nuclear Powered Warship (NPW) Safety" (PDF).
  • ^ Morten Bremer Maerli (1 January 2002). "Components of Naval Nuclear Fuel Transparency" (PDF). Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. Retrieved 7 February 2007. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  • ^ "Nuclear Submarine Dismantlement | NTI". nti.org. Retrieved 25 April 2021.
  • External links[edit]


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=United_States_naval_reactors&oldid=1220047012"

    Categories: 
    United States naval reactors
    Nuclear reactors
    Nuclear-powered ships of the United States Navy
    Hidden categories: 
    Pages using gadget WikiMiniAtlas
    CS1 errors: missing periodical
    Articles with short description
    Short description matches Wikidata
    Use dmy dates from August 2021
    Coordinates on Wikidata
    All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases
    Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from December 2015
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from February 2022
    Wikipedia articles needing clarification from September 2015
     



    This page was last edited on 21 April 2024, at 14:13 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki