![]() |
The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted.
Find sources: "Usage share of BitTorrent clients" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (May 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The usage share of BitTorrent clients is the percentage of users that use a particular BitTorrent client, regardless of version.
Rank | Application | Market Share |
---|---|---|
1 | μTorrent | 68.6% |
2 | BitTorrent | 6.6% |
3 | Libtorrent (μTorrent's web interface reports this as its client ID) | 6.3% |
4 | Transmission | 5.1% |
5 | MediaGet | 3.7% |
6 | qBittorrent | 3.4% |
7 | Zona | 3.3% |
8 | Deluge | 0.9% |
9 | BitComet | 0.6% |
10 | BiglyBT (operated by former developers of Vuze) | 0.3% |
11 | Free Download Manager | 0.2% |
12 | BitSpirit | 0.2% |
13 | BitLord | 0.1% |
14 | Tribler | <0.1% |
14 | FrostWire | <0.1% |
14 | Tixati | <0.1% |
14 | tTorrent | <0.1% |
14 | aTorrent | <0.1% |
14 | PicoTorrent | <0.1% |
Lifehacker, a software weblog, took a survey of 13,823 readers' preferred BitTorrent clients in May 2015. It showed that μTorrent still maintains a sizable lead over competitors, despite concerns over adware and bloatware. Runner-up Transmission was praised for being lightweight, while qBittorrent was praised for being cross-platform and open-source, Deluge for its plugin library, and Tixati for its simplicity.[2] Vuze, another notable client, failed to make an appearance in the top five for the first time.
Rank | Application | Percentage of users' preferred clients | Number of votes |
---|---|---|---|
1 | μTorrent | 42.47% | 5,870 |
2 | Transmission | 21.23% | 2,935 |
3 | qBittorrent | 18.75% | 2,592 |
4 | Deluge | 10.7% | 1,479 |
5 | Tixati | 6.85% | 947 |
A study by the Tribler P2P research team at the Delft University of Technology. To generate this data, samples were taken from a number of swarms of users which were then used to identify which BitTorrent client each user was using, this data was used by TorrentFreak in the table below:
Source | Date & Age | μTorrent |
Vuze |
BitTorrent (mainline) |
BitComet |
Transmission |
FlashGet |
Unknown |
Tuotu |
libtorrent | Xunlei |
Other |
Sample Size |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[3] | 16 September 2011; 12 years ago (2011-09-16) |
47.97% 267,466 |
22.49% 125,417 |
13.01% 72,536 |
1.01% 5,638 |
7% 39,011 |
? | 6.22% 34,703 |
? | 1.02% 5,703 |
? | 1.27% 7,062 |
100% 557,536 |
[4] [5] |
4 December 2009; 14 years ago (2009-12-04) |
25.77% 92,086,035 |
24.08% 86,055,354 |
4.82% 17,207,544 |
4.31% 15,403,400 |
3.26% 11,637,110 |
1.09% 3,882,628 |
1% 3,590,584 |
0.71% 2,531,472 |
0.63% 2,251,736 |
29.31% 104,717,386 |
3.02% 10,806,362 |
100% 357,301,730 |
[6] | 18 October 2009; 14 years ago (2009-10-18) |
60.16% 10,361 |
14.22% 2,449 |
8.65% 1,489 |
4.43% 763 |
3.65% 628 |
? | 7.97% 1,373 |
? | 0.31% 53 |
0.02% 3 |
0.59% 102 |
100% 17,221 |
[7] | 14 August 2009; 14 years ago (2009-08-14) |
56.81% | 18.13% | 11.79% | 4.71% | 2.95% | ? | 4.21% | ? | ? | ? | 1.40% | 100% 165,000+ |
[8] | 24 June 2009; 15 years ago (2009-06-24) |
55.84% | 16.85% | 12.01% | 6.50% | 1.60% | ? | 4.02% | ? | ? | ? | 3.17% | 100% 150,000+ |
Digital Music News collected the data from PC Pitstop, a company that gathers data from computers using their free online virus and malware scanners. The program scans Windows Registry to find which clients have been installed, more than a million Microsoft Windows computers were surveyed.
Rank | Application | Install % on Windows desktops |
---|---|---|
1 | LimeWire | 18% |
2 | μTorrent | 5.56% |
3 | BitTorrent (mainline) | 2.28% |
4 | Vuze | 2.11% |
5 | BitComet | 1.89% |
6 | Bitlord | 1.27% |
| |
---|---|
Companies |
|
People |
|
Technology |
|
Clients (comparison, usage share) |
|
Tracker software (comparison) |
|
Search engines (comparison) |
|
Defunct sites (comparison) |
|
Related topics |
|
|