Contents

User:allixpeeke/sandbox

This is the user sandboxofallixpeeke. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. Create or edit your own sandbox here. Other sandboxes: Main sandbox | Template sandbox Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!

Testing crap. Ignore. Ignore.

{{TOC limit|2}}

• All pages with titles beginning with User:Allixpeeke/sandbox
• All pages with titles containing Allixpeeke/sandbox
• Allixpeeke/sandbox
• Allixpeeke/sandboxatIMDb

• All pages with titles beginning with Tron
• All pages with titles containing Tron
• Tran (disambiguation)
• TronatIMDb

I agree with Mssr. Jerale.

It's not enough to preserve the Sacred Lexicon, which was foisted upon the galaxy back in the counterrevolution of 2787 by the Centralist Army Horde, lead by Lord Cyg Hamiltron. The Centralist Army Hord ensured that the Sacred Lexicon made too many concessions to the Slave Dominions of the Inner Sectors, and set the course for aggrandisements by the Mondo Supreme and his Assemblage of Chieftains.

While it is true that the preliminary preservationist agenda of returning to and upholding the Sacred Lexicon would be a tremendous step in the proper direction, it does not go far enough; ultimately, the Assemblage of Chieftains must be abolished along with the Office of Mondo Supreme. The many great species of our galaxy, along with the cyborgs and the androids, must be freed from all tyranny, must be freed to pursue their own lives without the Chieftain yoke restraining their progress.

Insofar as the Sacred Lexicon devolves power away from the Mondo Supreme and his Assemblage of Chieftains, it is to be lauded; but insofar as it maintains the fiction of the legitimacy of the Mondo Supreme and his Assemblage of Chieftains, it is ultimately a tool of counterrevolution and Hord Centralism.

Look up Cyborg in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

Cyborg Ron Paul has been providing bioelectrical care to beings of all species (and even to androids) since his memory implantation centuries ago, without bias. While it is definitely unfortunate that Cyborg Ron Paul failed to appropriately scan the brainwave data signal posted under his thoughtline before allowing it to be broadcast, that only proves he has a malfunctioning scanner unit, not that he endorsed the specist brainwave data signal. And, given that his conduct operations have indicated continually that he harbours absolutely no specist programming, methinks that those claiming that Cyborg Ron Paul is somehow himself a specist are either misguided, misprogrammed, or deceptibots.

True preservationists are completely cool with interspeciest relations, and reject all regulations thereupon, at any level of galactic control. However, preservationists also acknowledge that regulations are worse when enacted by a one-size-fits-all Assemblage of Chieftains. If regulations on interspeciest relations must exist, it is better for them to exist on the micro-dimensional level, so that it is easier to overthrow them and thereby allow interspecies equality.^{[citation needed]}

～ Our natural rights don't actually "come," per se, from anywhere. They're innate. It is within our nature to possess them, just as it is within the nature of something with green pigment to reflect light. We can logically deduce that we possess these natural, inalienable, negative rights because of the necessary absurdities that arise when we imagine either (A) the contradictory premise of positive rights (which we would have to accept were we to accept authority without negative rights) or (B) the other contradictory premise of inherent illegitimacy in all things (which we would have to accept were we to reject all conceptions of legitimate authority).

～ To put it another way, there are three options. The first option is that there is no such thing as legitimate authority, in which case all actions (even scratching one's own nose, even living, even dying) are inherently illegitimate and constitute violations of natural law. Without legitimate authority, all actions are natural crimes. The second option is that legitimate authority exists, but only over other people and the property of other people, never over one's self or one's own property. This takes the notion of positive rights to its logical extreme, thereby eliminating all possibility of negative rights. In such an existence, the right to enslave would exist, and the right to not be enslaved would not. Two persons could simultaneously be each others slaves, and would be in violation of natural law whenever they refused to abide by each others demands, including the command to unenslave. The absurdities are boundless with that option, and since every conception of positive rights must inherently conflict with one's negative rights, that leaves us with only one last option. The third option is that each individual is the natural owner of her or his own will and body (her or his inalienable property) and, by extension through the labour one commits with her or his body, all legitimately-acquired alienable goods (e.g., a chair, a farm, a piece of string, a bank note). In this third option, only negative rights exists because positive and negative rights logically cannot coexist in any universe bound by the law of noncontradiction. Since this third option is the only option that does not lead to logical absurdities, it's the only option that can be real. This is a true trichotomy.

～ Rights do not come from government, or society, or even from a god or demigod. That's why I call them innate and natural; it is within our nature to possess them. As conscious, acting, reasoning individuals, we could not exist any other way.

"TROFF" redirects here. For the document processing system, see troff. For other uses, see Tron (disambiguation).

Super-test allixpeeke 17:04, 1 September 2013 (UTC) allixpeeke 17:07, 1 September 2013 (UTC) allixpeeke (talk) 19:25, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

1. Jump to conclusions
2. Conclusions

Skip a few

99. 99
100. 100

The State!  Always and ever the government and its rulers and operators have been considered above the general moral law.  The "Pentagon Papers" are only one recent instance among innumerable instances in historyofmen, most of whom are perfectly honorable in their private lives, who lie in their teeth before the public.  Why?  For "reasons of State."  Service to the State is supposed to excuse all actions that would be considered immoralorcriminal if committed by "private" citizens.  The distinctive featureoflibertarians is that they coolly and uncompromisingly apply the general moral lawtopeople acting in their rolesasmembers of the State apparatus.  Libertarians make no exceptions.  For centuries, the State (or more strictly, individuals acting in their roles as "members of the government") has cloaked its criminal activityinhigh-sounding rhetoric.  For centuries the State has committed mass murder and called it "war"; then ennobled the mass slaughter that "war" involves.  For centuries the State has enslaved people into its armed battalions and called it "conscription" in the "national service."  For centuries the State has robbed people at bayonet point and called it "taxation."  In fact, if you wish to know how libertarians regard the State and any of its acts, simply think of the State as a criminal band, and all of the libertarian attitudes will logically fall into place.

— Murray N. Rothbard, For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto^[1]

This plot summary may be a hook or written as if for a listings magazine. Please help improve it by ensuring it covers the whole story, however briefly, and in an encyclopedic style. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In a world^[which?] where nothingness^{[qualify evidence]} interacts^[how?] with some people^[who?]

In a world{{which}} where nothingness{{qualify evidence}} interacts{{how}} with some people{{who}}

^{[by whom?]}

^[where?]

^{[clarification needed]}

^[when?]

^[why?]

^[opinion]

^{[citation needed]}

^{[weasel words]}

^{[dubious – discuss]}

This article needs an improved plot summary. Please help improve the plot summary. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

• Source^{[dead link]}
  • Source at the Wayback Machine (archived January 1, 2001)

This article is written like a personal reflection, personal essay, or argumentative essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings or presents an original argument about a topic. Please help improve it by rewriting it in an encyclopedic style. (Smarch 13002 BCE) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

If James Bond and Michael Westen were fighting, Michael Westen would surely win.  Despite Bond and Westen both being spies, Westen is the better spy, fighter, narrator, and strategist.  In conclusion, if there were a fight between James Bond and Michael Westen, Michael Westen would surely be the victor.^{[contradictory]}

Dear King Wario:

We, the people of Warioland, have certain grievances that we believe need to be addressed.

(1)    Because of your prohibition on domestic production, import, trade, and consumption of toothpaste, we, the people of Warioland, have no access to any toothpaste outside of the black market.  Toothpaste sold on the black market is notably less safe than toothpaste sold on a free market, for when a person buys unsafe toothpaste in a free market, the purchaser can easily sue the person or persons responsible for the hazardous contents of said toothpaste, while a person who buys toothpaste in a black market cannot issue lawsuits without outing her- or himself as a criminal purchaser of the prohibited product.  By regulating or outlawing toothpaste, not only do you ensure that a black market in toothpaste will arise by inflating the profit margins of those dabbling in the trade of toothpaste (which you do by artificially decreasing supply of toothpaste relative to the demand thereof), but you create a sort of "bubble of protection" around black-market toothpaste chemists and peddlers, a bubble that protects them from the responsibility they would otherwise have in a self-regulating free market, the responsibility to ensure that their products are safe for consumers.  Indeed, the sole good that has ever arisen out of your antitoothpaste laws are that they make using toothpaste seem "rebellious," "cool," and "hip" to the youth of Warioland.  Kids in the schools of Warioland are known for sneaking off to the bathroom between classes for a brushing.  But let's face it, King Wario, other than that one unintended positive consequence of your otherwise tyrannical law, your antitoothpaste laws are an utter failure.  You cannot even keep toothpaste out of your own prisons; how, then, do you propose to rid the entire island of toothpaste?  (Also, why?)

(2)    Other reasons, too.

So, as you can see, King Wario, we have a number of grievances we need addressed.  Please make haste.

Signed,
The People of Warioland

C L A S S I C A L · L A T I N

• Middle English (thou, thee, thy, -eþ)
• Early Modern English (thou, thee, thy)
• ū

• The Other Letters

There are four days in the Peakian week.  They are:

1. Winday
2. Earthday
3. Waterday
4. Fireday

Winday, Earthday, and Waterday are weekdays, while Fireday is the weekend.

It must be noted that there is a very small, albeit vocal, minority that petition to have the days renamed Gasday, Soliday, Liquiday, and Plasmaday respectively. Two factors that have hitherto prevented this from gaining steam include the general displeasure associated with the name Gasday and the scientific reality that the full number of material states actually exceeds the four states about which one commonly thinks.

There are seven weeks in the typical Peakian month (excluding Member and sometimes also excluding September).  They are:

1. Freedomweek
2. Loveweek
3. Mindweek
4. Restweek
5. Friendweek
6. Dreamweek
7. Musicweek

Some have suggested that the names of the weeks be changed, but the general consensus remains that the seven traditional names remain.  One set of alternative names that have been suggested include:

1. Mercuriana
2. Venusiana
3. Marsiana
4. Jupiteriana
5. Saturiana
6. Uranusiana
7. Neptuiana

Another set of alternative names that have been suggested include:

1. Nameriweek
2. Sameriweek
3. Euriweek
4. Afriweek
5. Asiweek
6. Australiweek
7. Antartiweek

There are thirteen months in the Peakian calendar, each lasting exactly twenty-eight days (or seven weeks), except for Member, which would have twenty-nine days, and September, which would have twenty-nine days each leap year.  They are:

1. Member (sometimes called Primilis)
2. Bember (sometimes called Sectilis)
3. Trember (sometimes called Tertilis)
4. Quadrember (sometimes called Quadrilis)
5. Quintember (sometimes called Quintilis)
6. Sextember (sometimes called Sextilis)
7. September
8. Octember (sometimes called October)
9. November
10. December
11. Undecember
12. Duodecember
13. Tredecember (sometimes called Smarch)

Leap year in the Peakian calendar works in exactly the same way as it does in the Gregorian calendar.

One suggestion commonly made is to measure the day in seconds, decaseconds, hectoseconds, kiloseconds, and myriaseconds.  However, given the desire to not alter the unit of second, and considering that there are technically approximately 86,164.0910 seconds in each rotation period of the Earth, the question ultimately remains on how best to go about this.

Since there are 86,400 seconds in any given twenty-four hour period, one suggestion is to continue defining the day as twenty-four hours in length, also known as 8,640 decaseconds, 864 hectoseconds, 86.4 kiloseconds, or 8.64 myriaseconds.  This would leave the calendar’s standard on leap years intact.

The other suggestion is that, since there are approximately 86,164.0910 seconds in each rotation period of the Earth, to define the length of the day as 86,164.091 seconds, 8,616.4091 decaseconds, 861.64091 hectoseconds, 86.164091 kiloseconds, or 8.6164091 myriaseconds.  While this would allow for the day to be defined strictly by the rotational period of the Earth, and would allow for a revision on the way leap year works.

The apparent problem with both of these approaches, however, is that they leave an untidy mess of decimal points, thus making it that much more difficult for the average person to calculate easily how long ago something may have occured in measurements more fine-tuned than the day.

A countersuggestion sometimes made is to adopt French Revolutionary Time.  However, this would obviously require changing the standard length of the unit the second, which most users of the Peakian calendar greatly desire avoiding.

All users of the Peakian calendar agree that daylight saving time (DST) is absurd.  Users of the Peakian calendar advocate permanent standard time, and abolition of all government edicts aimed at forcing people to recognise and adhere to DST.

However, how to go about promoting permanent standard time is debated amongst users of the Peakian calendar.

Those users of the Peakian calendar who advocate sticking to a twenty-four-hour-day system typically promote the view that there should be twenty-four separate standard times, with the various standard times set not by governments, but rather by the passing of Sol over the twenty-four respective meridians, roughly similar to the manner in which time zones are set up currently.  The difference would be that, because governments would no longer be defining their respective time zones, two different time zones may exist within the same country, state, county, or even town.

Contrariwise, those users of the Peakian calendar who prefer to see days divided into hectoseconds, kiloseconds, &c., tend to prefer a panterrestrial standard time, wherein the standard time is set for the whole planet based on the passage of Sol over the Prime Meridian.  Advocates argue that this would decrease confusion by allowing all Earthlings to know exactly what is meant by zero-o-clock without having to figure out what time zone is being used.

• Definitions from Wiktionary

Media from Commons

News from Wikinews

Quotations from Wikiquote

Texts from Wikisource

Textbooks from Wikibooks

Resources from Wikiversity

Aklemit is a fictional humanoid creature.  According to legend, the klemit is a very rare, wall-dwelling monster with a strong sweet tooth and a nasty temper.  Klemits are also said to have very little tolerance for light, which explains their general preference for living within walls.  While owning a house with a klemit comes with the responsibility of constantly feeding it sugary foods, such as candyorsyrup, the major benefit of owning such a house is that it brings said owner tremendous good fortune.  The degree to which this luck is good diminishes, however, to the extent that the klemit’s presence is popularly known.

The mythical creature was created by Philip Levens and made its first appearance in the eighth episode of R. L. Stein’s The Haunting Hour: The Series, titled “Walls.”  This episode first aired on 5 February 2011onThe Hub.  The klemit depicted in this episode was short (by modern Homo sapiens standards), and had littletono hair, six clawed fingers, a tail, and wrinkly, dark, yellowed skin.  It was played by Matt Phillips.

• R. L. Stein
• List of R. L. Stine’s The Haunting Hour: The Series episodes
• Hedonism
• Gluttony

• “R. L. Stine’s The Haunting Hour: The Making of a Monster — Ep. 8, Season 1 (behind the screams)” on hubworld.com
• “The Klemit” on rlstinesthehauntinghour.wikia.com
• “Klemit” on urbandictionary.com
• R. L. Stine’s The Haunting Hour: The SeriesatIMDb

In the 1993 family movie Hocus Pocus, salt is used as a weapon against witches. Aring of salt can be made, over which the witches cannot cross.

In the television series Supernatural, salt is primarily used to fight ghosts and dæmons.  A ring of salt can be made over which ghosts and hellhounds cannot cross, and rifles can be loaded with rock salt, which, when shot at a ghost, causes it to dissipate.  In order to eliminate a ghost for good, the bones of the ghost must be salted and burned.^[2]

Rings of salt are also used by Wiccans in television series True Blood.^[3]  In “Fresh Blood” (S3E11, 29 August 2010), Holly Cleary sets up a circle of salt and candles “for protection and purity,” inside of which she is able to create an abortive tea potion.  Wiccans also perform spells within a ring of salt in “I'm Alive and On Fire” (S4E4, 17 July 2011), and in “And When I Die” (S4E12, 11 September 2011), a possessed medium (Lafayette Reynolds as possessed by Marnie Stonebrook) is unable to cross the salt circle.

The aliens in the R. L. Stine’s The Haunting Hour: The Series episode “Alien Candy” (S1E10, 19 February 2011) are vulnerable to salt.  It is explained by the main character, Walt, that the aliens possess permeable skin like frogs and slugs; thus, by throwing salt onto the aliens, water is drawn out of their bodies, causing them to shrivel and die.

In the 2013 film The Last Exorcism Part II, a ring of salt is made around Nell Margaret Sweetzer, and salted holy water is given to her intravenously in order to aid the Order of the Right Hand in freeing Nell from a dæmon's grasp.  While the salt succeeds in preventing the dæmon from stepping across the salt line, the dæmon is nevertheless capable of reaching across it.

The central thrust of Cartesian libertarianism can be summed up in the maxim, "Cogito, ergo sum prandium non libero."