Est omnino difficile iudicare inclusionis meritum cuiusdam rei in encyclopædia cum ratio sciendi quid populi referat incerta sit, sed nihilominus aliquid encyclopædiam dedecet
It is generally difficult to judge the worthiness of a particular topic for inclusion in an encyclopedia considering that there is no certain way to know what interests people, but some topics nevertheless are not fit for an encyclopedia.
This motto reflects the desire of these Wikipedians to be reluctant, but not entirely unwilling, to remove articles from Wikipedia.
Hi, names Pat. I started out editing Wikipedia more than 15 years ago when my interests were "electric bicycle" or "power-assisted bicycle"(PAB). You may find me occasionally contributing information and, most importantly, updating references to articles with relevant and sometimes inaccessible sources. I love attention to details and will likely contribute adversarial information that is very well sourced and referenced.
Feel free to edit this page for capitalisation, factual accuracy, grammar, spelling, punctuation, membership updates, vandalism and wikification. A few people have already done this, so go on, it's a wiki! Thank You!
From other media sources (such as
.wav files of me singing) using BeSweet v1.4, BeSweetGUI v0.6b61, and most importantly The OggMachine v0.62[1]. Also since I use windows vista I had to download msvbvm50.exe directly from Microsoft to run the GUI.
Use Switch Sound File Converter Unlicensed Basic Free Version... convert the file... upload... and since I don't have to codec to listen to it on my computer, listen to it on Wikipedia's java thingy ([2]
Though du life in general
In life, and relationships, it's not always fair. You'll give more. You may become frustrated when people don't do what is necessary or what you expect of them. A philosophy that you should live by, which I must thank my neighbor for explaining, is to do what you believe is the best. Do what is right, even though it's more than your share of the work. In love and relationships you must give what is needed and, sometimes, this is more than what you would like to give. This is when youll realize that you are not only living to your fullest but also being the best you can be, which should, despite any frustrations of perhaps having to do extra work, make you a happy person!
Though du wiki
[edit]Anxkcd strip entitled "Wikipedian Protestor." This image goes to all the hypocritical wikipedians that have pissed me off by putting unsourced information back into an article and claiming disruptive editing, lack of good faith and lack of Consensus. Clearly this contradict Wikipedia's fundemental rules for Citation and Verifiable content and leads to enraged comments (BEGIN FLAME) such as the term "Fuck you! (END FLAME)
At Wikipedia, points of view (POV) are often essential to articles which treat controversial subjects. In The Globe and mail on February 20th 2006 at page A14 in the Section of Social Studies, sub-section A daily miscellany of Information, micheal Kesteron cited Harold Geneen in his Though du jour and stated:
"The reliability of the person giving you the facts is as important as the facts themselves. Keep in mind that facts are seldom facts, but what people think are facts, heavily tinged with assumptions."
Hard facts are really rare. What we most commonly encounter are opinions from people (POV's). Inherently, because of this, most articles at wikipedia are full of POV's. An article which clearly, accurately, and fairly describes all the major points of view will, by definition, be in accordance with Wikipedia's official "Neutral Point of View" policy.
Users for whom my high regard is held... (Inbold are those to whom I have awarded barnstars, italicised are Admins, green are Bureaucrats and stricken are those who have left the project)
If things didn't work out between us, don't worry there are plenty of other fish out there!This image demonstrates your risks of collisions and conflict with being user:CyclePat
