You have 88 pages on your watchlist (not counting talk pages); you can display and edit the complete list. In the time period selected below, users have made 31337 edits to articles in the English version of Wikipedia. Checking watched pages for recent edits...
Euphoria may refer to;
A psychological state of intense good feeling. [disambiguation page]
This is a disambiguation page; that is, one that points to other pages that might otherwise have the same name. If you followed a link here, you might want to go back and fix that link to point to the appropriate specific page.
Could you please write your edit summaries in plain English? They would be much more helpful than the leetspeak summaries that you are currently using. Thanks. Guanaco 17:05, Aug 6, 2004 (UTC)
U zh0ULD 83 gr34Tphhu1 zz@T 3y3 d0 N0t #r!te zz3m !N |<L!N90N!!!! &nd zz@t 3Y3 M 3D!T!N9 d3h 4RT!(L3ZZZ zzz3mz31v3zz 1n uR 3NN9L!zh33!!! R U 90!N9 2 84N M3 2 d3h http://l33t.wikipedia.org n0\/\/?
Reverts are appropriate only for demonstrably bad-faith editing, such as making controversial changes without regard for objections.
A responsible user should bring controversial issues to the attention of the community.
anextreme neutralist, uninterested in promoting any point of view outside of discussions:
The ability to write from a neutral point of view is a skill that is not difficult to acquire.
NPOV editing does not conflict with other editing goals, and should never be compromised except for personal essays, fiction, and humor.
Provided all the relevant facts are available, it is not difficult to tell whether writing is POV.
amoderate inclusionist, feeling that most articles have some value:
Articles may be deleted if they are of no value to anyone.
Deficient pages can usually be improved with editing.
With the exceptions of simple deductive reasoning or eduction to expand existing articles, original research has no place outside the user namespace.
anmoderate individualist, believing that each person has propriety over their beliefs and means of expression:
A user page belongs solely to its user and is sacrosanct regardless of its content.
Everyone is entitled to their own points of view and freedom from persecution for their views.
When the Wikipedia community objects to a user's contributions, the ideal compromise is for the user to copy their editing to personal subpages, allowing each side to do what they wish with the content.
Every user has a moral obligation to improve Wikipedia however they are able.
