Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Pages whose history has been lost  



1.1  Unresolved  





1.2  Resolved  



1.2.1  Nostalgia Wikipedia  





1.2.2  March 2002 database dump  





1.2.3  January 2003 database dump  





1.2.4  May 2003 database dump  









2 Some close calls  





3 Revision ID numbers  





4 Strange times reported in diffs  





5 Talk pages created before articles  





6 Fun page history facts  





7 Notes  














User:Graham87/Page history observations

















User page
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
User contributions
User logs
View user groups
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

< User:Graham87

Here is a collection of observations I've made about page history oddities. I find out if there are page histories to merge by checking deleted contributions of early editors, and checking articles on place name lists like List of urban areas by population or national place name lists. I also use the lists at WikiProject History Merge to find pages to history merge. Sometimes, I can use old copies of Wikipedia to restore the missing history or find pages with lost edits (see my further notes on this and the "Resolved" section. If you find any other page history oddities, feel free to let me know.

Pages whose history has been lost

[edit]

Page history started to be reliably kept and dated after the conversion to Phase II software in January 2002 (see Wikipedia:Usemod article histories for caveats). Therefore, all history from that time onwards should theoretically be accessible. However, some page history has disappeared entirely due to moves and deletions. The following situation is typical:

Any page history deleted before 8 June 2004 is no longer in the current Wikipedia database. Some very early revisions appear in Nostalgia Wikipedia, a copy of the Wikipedia database from 20 December 2001, and some old database dumps are available, which can be used to find and restore missing edits; for more information about how I copy those edits to the current Wikipedia database, see User:Graham87/Import. The following articles have missing history which seemingly cannot be restored by sysops:

Unresolved

[edit]

These cases cannot be sufficiently resolved by any of the publicly available database dumps:

Resolved

[edit]

These cases have been either mostly or entirely fixed using old copies of the Wikipedia database. Unless otherwise specified, they have been completely resolved.

Nostalgia Wikipedia

[edit]

March 2002 database dump

[edit]

January 2003 database dump

[edit]

May 2003 database dump

[edit]

Some close calls

[edit]

I have restored some page history that was deleted due to page moves. Most of these operations were trivial, like this one at Accra. However, the following are interesting cases and show the problems with cut and paste moves. See my logs dealing with:

Also see the contributions of Ipo3, a page move vandal, and the logs of Angela Merkel (disambiguation) and Small Business Administration (disambiguation), to see what can go wrong with page move vandalism. Ipo3's edits particularly affected the Klingon article.

In another science fiction franchise, the Palpatine article also had missing edits. Its history was moved to "Palpatine, Dantius", a name for the character cpoined by SuperShadow, who ran a Star Wars website, and then the page was moved by cut-and-paste back to Palpatine. The "Palpatine, Dantius" page was redirected to the SuperShadow article then moved to Dantius Palpatine; the redirect was deleted after a deletion discussion for the SuperShadow article, taking all the early history of the Palpatine page with it.

If the deleted revisions had been cleared out or there was a bad database crash, the page histories mentioned above may have become permanently inaccessible.

Revision ID numbers

[edit]

When a revision is added to the database, it is assigned an ID number, which is one more than that of the previous revision. Thus, in general, a low revision ID number will indicate an early edit while a higher revision number will indicate a more recent edit. Revision ID numbers can be a reasonable way to estimate the date of a revision, with some caveats.

Edits made when Wikipedia used UseModWiki were imported to the current Wikipedia database on 20 September 2002; therefore they have revision ID's over 200,000. The edit with a revision ID of 1 is not Wikipedia's earliest edit, but it is the first edit to be added using the Phase II software.

Before Wikipedia was upgraded to MediaWiki 1.5 in late June 2005, if a revision was deleted and then undeleted, it would get a new ID number as if it was a brand new revision. For example, this edit to the article "Wikipedia" has an ID number of 13,435,822, even though the edit was made in December 2001, because the article was deleted and restored before June 2005. For comparison, the revision with the previous ID number of 13,435,821 was made in May 2005.[note 1]

Page transfers via Special:Import or manually on the server also result in "out-of-order" revision IDs. Revision IDs do not increase monotonically with time, and you should never rely on this. --brion (talk) 16:42, 20 October 2008 (UTC) [1]

Strange times reported in diffs

[edit]

Here are some revision links that show the consequences of the server clocks being reset. See T4219 for other examples.

  • Carnivàle
  • History of knitting
  • LASEK
  • Late West Saxon
  • Nikola Tesla
  • Online poker
  • Talk:Mainland China/Archive 1
  • Talk:Motorway
  • User talk:205.182.87.1
  • User talk:Kim Bruning
  • User talk:Mike Halterman
  • Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
  • Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Human Atrocities
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Assassination of Richard Nixon
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Westcountry Brythonic
  • Wikipedia:Image recreation requests
  • Wikipedia:Image sleuthing (edit #1) and Wikipedia:Image sleuthing (edit #2)
  • Category:Engines
  • The unusual times in this diff at "User:CryptoDerk/CDVF" probably occurred because one of the servers was set to the wrong time zone. The out-of-order edit makes the relevant page history seem rather confusing. Another set of out-of-order edits is this edit to Template:Edit.

    Another situation in which there can be incorrect timestamps is a result of early versions of MediaWiki. When pages were moved over redirects, the edit history of the newly created redirect would show the date and time when the overwritten redirect was created. There are more details in the section of the page move guidance about moving over a redirect, along with an example at Talk:PETA.

    Many edits, especially those by Conversion script, are incorrectly reported as having occurred on 25 February 2002 (UTC) due to an early database glitch that was once called the "great oops".

    Incorrect timestamps can also affect the reported creation times of accounts at places like the list of all users, because this information wasn't oficially recorded in the database until the introduction of the user creation loginSeptember 2005.

    Talk pages created before articles

    [edit]

    Sometimes, the first visible edit to a talk page can have an earlier timestamp than that of the corresponding article. This can happen for several reasons, including copyright violations (where early article history is deleted) and unusual page moves. With my encouragement, my friend Codeofdusk wrote an extended essay about this topic, which can be found at User:Codeofdusk/ee.

    Fun page history facts

    [edit]

    Notes

    [edit]
    1. ^ Out-of-order revision IDs are associated with some historical bugs. Until May 2017, the inconsistent ID numbers could cause problems when checking diffs, as diff navigation was based on the revision ID of edits rather than their timestamps (see T4930). Before the MediaWiki 1.18 update, the software also calculated the number of intermediate revisions between diffs by using revision ID's rather than timestamps; that result was incorrect when the order of the revision ID's did not correspond to the dates of the edits. An example of this phenomenon was at this edittoTalk:Netherlands, which now displays correctly as of the MediaWiki 1.18 update.



    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Graham87/Page_history_observations&oldid=1228082385"

    Hidden category: 
    Indexed pages
     



    This page was last edited on 9 June 2024, at 10:54 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki