Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Barnstars  





2 Examples of freaky deleted articles  





3 Totally unnotable statements  





4 Completely false statements  





5 Complete rubbish  





6 Examples of ownership  





7 Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions  





8 Trying to save articles from deletion  





9 Apparently some people still think ambassadors are inherently notable?  





10 and people also think "ambassador to" and consulate articles are inherently notable  





11 Great irony  





12 Notes on bilateral agreements  





13 Misconceptions of google news  





14 My views on single purpose editors  





15 Daily page views  





16 Referencing  














User:LibStar

















User page
Talk
 

















Read
View source
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
View source
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
User contributions
User logs
View user groups
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Barnstars

The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
Awarded for consistently and continuously nominating the cruft de la cruft of bilateral relations articles to AfD. BlueSquadronRaven 18:10, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
For your tireless research in finding "Xcountry- Ycountry relations" that simply don't merit inclusion and for putting up with all the opposition you've had to endure. Some editors actually appreciate your efforts. Niteshift36 (talk) 05:43, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


The Barnstar of Diligence
For your commitment to ensuring that articles of dubious notability are defended with actual sources and not flimsy puffery. Yaksar (let's chat) 05:41, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For working tirelessly to prevent Wikipedia from being turned into some sort of United Nations Yellow Pages.
Keep up the great work! Stalwart111 00:30, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thanks for doing your part at AfD! Keep up the great work! МандичкаYO 😜 07:45, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar
for regularly sending non notable articles about ambassadors to deletion discussion. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk ! 06:10, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
The Copyeditor's Barnstar
For improving the opening sentences of articles. So they are short. And clear. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 02:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Examples of freaky deleted articles

Totally unnotable statements

Bell Times

Student School Timetable
Period Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
Period 1 8:40 am – 9:35 am 8:40 am – 9:35 am 8:40 am – 9:35am 8:40 am – 9:30 am 8:40 am – 9:30 am
Period 2 9:35 am – 10:30 am 9:35 am – 10:30 am 9:35 am – 10:30 am 9:30 am – 10:20 am 9:30 am – 10:20 am
Pastoral Care - - - 10:20 am – 10:50 am -
Recess 10:30 am – 10:50 am 10:30 am – 10:50 am 10:30 am – 10:50 am 10:50 am – 11:10 am 10:20 am – 11:00 am
Period 3 10:50 am – 11:45 am 10:50 am – 11:45 am 10:50 am – 11:45 am 11:10 am – 12:00 am 11:00 am – 11:50 am
Period 4 11:45 am – 12:40 pm 11:45 am – 12:40 pm 11:45 am – 12:40 pm 12:00 pm – 12:50 pm 11:50 am – 12:40 pm
Lunch 12:40 pm – 1:20 pm 12:40 pm – 1:20 pm 12:40 pm – 1:20 pm 12:50 pm – 1:30 pm 12:40 pm – 1:20 pm
Period 5 1:20 pm – 2:10 pm 1:20 pm – 2:10 pm 1:20 pm – 2:10 pm 1:30 pm – 2:15 pm 1:20 pm – 2:10 pm
Period 6 - 2:10 pm – 3:00 pm 2:10 pm – 3:00 pm 2:15 pm – 3:00 pm 2:10 pm – 3:00 pm

A Block: A01, A02, A03, A04 C Block: C01, C02, C03 Drama Rooms: D01, D02 E Block: E01, E02, E03, E04 F Block: F01, F02, F03 I Music: I.M, I.M 2 M Music Main: M01, M02

Completely false statements


Complete rubbish

Examples of ownership

Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions

Besides what's stated in Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, here's a few more extremely weak and lazy arguments I've encountered:

completely lazy vote that makes zero effort to demonstrate how any notability guideline is met.
shame, as the article would have clearly failed good article criteria
yes someone did say this, unfortunately the article in question did get it deleted. sorry
!!!!
that's right the lack of references is a reason for keeping the article and of course, this editor didn't bother to do a google search to see if anything existed to prove notability
Article creator trying to explain in an AfD why the only mention of his organisation in Google search was the Wikipedia article. In fact, he gave one of the best reasons I've seen for delete
and the editor didn't provide a shred of evidence to back this vague argument.
that's right, asking a local newspaper to publish an article on X in the hope to advance notability for a Wikipedia article.
Article creator trying to explain in an AfD why "my" article should be kept.
the user tried to argue keep, despite the complete lack of third party sources. but that's right, just ignore established guidelines like WP:CREATIVE, WP:BIO, WP:N, WP:GNG and call something notable even though it satisfies no guideline.
that's right we can now create any article in WP with one source, despite WP:GNG clearly stating significant coverage. what's worse is that an admin (who seems to always vote keep) came up with this lame argument without any evidence of significant coverage.
WP:AGF does not apply to assuming sources when none can be found. this is a very lame argument for keeping.
so because it "seems notable" it is notable? and we relax rules for non profit organisation despite many non profit organisations such as Red Cross, Amnesty International, UNDP, are very notable in their own right.

That's right, invent criterion for WP:N to suit your case.

That's right, even though the article in question had no third party sources, telling people to get... is the best way to save.

That's right, we relax GNG because of your personal preference to keep.

making threats always helps your cause
that's right no sources is ok for a Wikipedia article. and seems notable is not the same as being notable.
because it has a Wikipedia article it is therefore notable? circular logic if I ever heard it.
that's right invent a criterion of mulitple editors working on the same article, when little sources can be found.
the only problem was admin X merely relisted the discussion and expressed no opinion for keep or delete. This kind of voting shows how lame some of these blind keep voters are. They don't even bother to read the AfD, let alone the article or do any search for sources, just turn up to the AfD pick a random person to vote keep per whatever.
the only problem was editor X listed the article for deletion! This kind of voting shows how lame some of these blind keep voters are. They don't even bother to read the AfD. What's better is that this vote was the same person who provided previous question keep per vote.
note how this argument contains absolutely no reasoning how any notability guideline is met. and of course they can't even be bothered to search for sources. lazy !voting indeed.

so don't see it as really necessary is actually a reason for delete! It was a list of almost all red entries with one source.!

That's right, expect someone else to find the sources for you that would be easily found. This person's internet doesn't go beyond their national boundaries.

Excellent reasoning for deletion

wow what a criterion

an attempt to lower the bar of notability just so an article can pass

That's right just invent your own notability criterion to suit your keep vote. Who cares if it's a red link

the onus is on keep voters to find sources. This is how AfD works.

Pretty much sums up why this editor never votes delete... because it's evil!

compelling argument for delete if I ever saw one

obviously too lazy/can't be bothered providing sources
oh really?
yes being very intelligent is a criterion for notability
That's right, ignore SIGCOV because it isn't required for determining notability.

Now really?

They obviously haven't read WP:GNG.
really? And this was said by an admin!

Trying to save articles from deletion

Whilst the addition of well sourced information is always welcome, I have seen time and time again, scraping the bottom of the barrel from a google search to try to insert little factoids that have countries X and Y in the text. Examples include:

Apparently some people still think ambassadors are inherently notable?

  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stéphanie Allard-Gomez
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somphone Sichaleune
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis Cabrera y Cuarón
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahendr Dosieah
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susumu Shibata
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Fraser (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Courtney (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Pearson (Canadian diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Richardson (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrei Knyazev (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Kutz
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne-Marie Bourcier (2nd nomination)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter January
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claude Baillargeon
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Andrigo
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Michel Bédard
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Ignatius
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Troy Lulashnyk
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Adamson
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Leslie Brown
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yves Gagnon
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurette Glasgow
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sergey Kryukov (2nd nomination)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serge April
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miyoko Akashi (2nd nomination)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nobutaka Shinomiya
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Pierre Bolduc
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amir Hussain Sikder
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ada Filip-Slivnik
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Blauveldt
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kurt Meyer (High Commissioner)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martha Elena Toledo-Ocampo Ureña
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malcolm McGoun
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diego José Tobón Echeverri
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Riley (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo Lagos Andino
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Odinga
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamil Sakr (2nd nomination)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Kupfer
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arif Mahmood
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Majid Khan (Pakistani diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haidar Hadi
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raimkul Attakurov
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pak Tok-hun
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/N. Balasubramaniam
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marģers Krams (2nd nomination)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moragodage Christopher Walter Pinto
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attiya Mahmood
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faiz Mohammad Khoso
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chimango Chirwa (2nd nomination)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rex Christopher Shelton Koelmeyer
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranjit Uyangoda
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glanville Peiris
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamini Seneviratne
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Aflal Jawad
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devinda Subasinghe
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shigeo Iwatani
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karunatilaka Amunugama (2nd nomination)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jalal Uddin Chowdhury
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imtiaz Ahmed (bangladeshi diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudhir Vyas
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward P. Brynn
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Álvaro Moerzinger (2nd nomination)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toshio Yamanaka
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axel Weishaupt
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solomon Witbooi
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Pierre Louyebo
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rooslina Weti Pg Kamaluddin
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nguyên Đình
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmad Sayer Daudzai
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valerie Caton
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matti Häkkänen
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chabaka Kilumanga
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Kahanoff
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yehuda Levin (ambassador)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hagit Ben-Yaakov
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Bhattacharya
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prabhat Prakash Shukla
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Fox (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lydia Morton
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Tanner (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angus Macdonald (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soehardjono Sastromihardjo
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Clarke (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonam Tshong
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Farnworth
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison Blackburne
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugh Mortimer
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Stanton
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Rampling
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corin Robertson
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Shorter
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Thomas (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Mullee
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Lyster-Binns
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucia Wilde
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Butcher
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fraser Wilson
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Tesorière (2nd nomination)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Henderson (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry Lowen
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Wildash
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Marschall Jones
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Cantor
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Lyall Sharp
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Benjamin (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carole Crofts
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Bucknell
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosemary Thomas (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Archer
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Davenport (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Longhurst
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Reader
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Dew (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fiona Clouder
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Maltman
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunaajav Batjargal
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abubakarr Multi-Kamara
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Crosbie (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andres Talvik
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Jarrold
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre Léon Gérard Asselin
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aubrey Morantz
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Baker (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen Campbell
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Léopold Battel
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clayton George Bullis
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilfrid Marcel Agnès
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Morris
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gao Jian (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marta Moszczenska
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terence Charles Bacon
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bertram Charles Butler
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dennis Brian Browne
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Clemence Gordon Brown
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Shwabsky
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barbara Gibson (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Inglehearn
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacques J.A. Asselin
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yves Boulanger
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natasha Cayer
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Ovington
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anne Quinane
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virginia Greville
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Lawrence Paynter
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Cecil Anderson
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Bentley
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric John Bergbusch
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oon Yung
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. Denis Bélisle
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahryar Rashed
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Bezanson
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valerie Raymond
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Hulan
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Georges Marc Baudouin
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Rollins Barker
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Landsman
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Wilcock
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadia Burger
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Wolstenholme
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Anderson
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Hradecky
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Yvon (2nd nomination)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Cole (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyn Parker
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael D. Metelits
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doloonjingiin Idevkhten
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Kakko
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Evans (2nd nomination)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernard Whiteside
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Lewington (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Kirk
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iain Walker
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathy Bunka
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Oppenheim
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theresa Bubbear
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekaterini Xagorari
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Moran (diplomat) (2nd nomination)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yaw Safo Boafo
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Kumar Verma
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asim Iftikhar Ahmad
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renata Wielgosz (2nd nomination)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashok Attri (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Simmons (2nd nomination)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anton Ojala
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer M. Adams (2nd nomination)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Adler (diplomat)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicola Rosenblum
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Corcoran
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lironne Bar-Sade
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MaryEllen Miller
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Raper
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophia McIntyre
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Bogdan
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Ibne Abbas
  • and people also think "ambassador to" and consulate articles are inherently notable

    Great irony

    It was pointed out to a user that they were WP:BLUDGEON in a deletion discussion, and this was their response:

    The short version of what is wrong with BLUDGEON is, that since consensus is not a vote, and depends on the quality of arguments, we cannot put an arbitrary word limit on discussions, as opposed to forbidding mere repetition, because it would make it impossible to assess consensus, because there is a finite limit to the level of conciseness with which some arguments can be presented. Such a limit would altogether prevent some valid arguments from being moved by anyone, unless the number of participants was huge. BLUDGEON is only an essay and it happens to be incompatible with policy. None of your criticisms of me is accurate an I could throw some of them straight back at you. You, for example, engage in an excessive amount of mere repetition, saying things you have already said once over and over and over again, in a way that contributes nothing to this discussion, seemingly in a bid to shout the other side down. If that isn't BLUDGEON, nothing is. Your answer to this post is sure to repeat your "long winded" remark, for the millionth time, with no new meaningful arguments, something of which I am growing extremely tired and should not have to read. I've also been on Wikipedia several years now and encountered hundreds of editors. So what? How is that relevant? No one with a normal attention span would be tired of my comments, and they are no longer than is absolutely necessary. Even BLUDGEON, in all its extremism, doesn't argue that we have to agree with other people's opinions. I'm not trying to get snow keeps, merely to answer novel arguments/ideas that have not previously been discussed, having not appeared in earlier !votes, and need to be discussed


    Notes on bilateral agreements

    It has come up many a time in bilateral AfDs on the legality of bilateral agreements. many agreements are not legally binding and therefore not as strong as a treaty in adding to bilateral relations. Even weaker are "memos of understanding" and "protocols"

    from p.8 of [1]

    Two specific terms related to the concept of customary international law require further attention. The first one is ‘soft law’. This term does not have a fixed legal meaning, but it usually refers to any international instrument other than a treaty containing principles, norms, standards or other statements of expected behaviour. Often, the term soft law is used as having the same meaning as a non-legally binding instrument, but this is not correct. An agreement is legally binding or is not-legally binding. A treaty that is legally binding can be considered as hard law; however, a non-legally binding instrument does not necessarily constitute soft law. The consequences of such a non-legally binding instrument are not clear. Sometimes it is said that they contain political or moral obligations, but this is not the same as soft law. Non-legally binding agreements emerge when States agree on a specific issue, but they do not, or do not yet, wish to bind themselves legally; nevertheless they wish to adopt certain non-binding rules and principles before they become law.

    Misconceptions of google news

    Apparently a minority of editors think gnews is an inadequate means to find sources. In the majority of cases, it is definitely a means of finding reliable sources in established news sources. Google News can help assess whether something is newsworthy.

    Here are some common misconceptions:

    The best misconception is people who criticise me but fail to find reliable sources themselves.

    My views on single purpose editors

    In all my years on WP, I've encountered many single purpose editors, almost all seem to have a vested interest with the article subject indicating a strong conflict of interest.

    There is also no excuse for a regular editor to not have an WP:ACCOUNT. For this reason, I will ignore messages from anon IPs posted on my talk page.

    Daily page views

    Referencing


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:LibStar&oldid=1233642129"

    Categories: 
    Wikipedia rollbackers
    Wikipedia pending changes reviewers
    Members of the Fifteen Year Society of Wikipedia editors
     



    This page was last edited on 10 July 2024, at 04:49 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki