Contents

User:Piotrus/Templates

Welcome with WikiProject invite:

{{subst:User:Piotrus/w|WikiProject}}

Poland-project specific invite:

{{subst:Portal:Poland/Welcome}}

Invitation to DYK:

{{subst:User:Piotrus/TDYK|article}}

Request to use assessment templates:

{{subst:User:Piotrus/AT|article}}

Request to use reflinks: On Bare URLs I've noticed that your article [[]] uses [[Wikipedia:Bare URLs|bare URLs]] which are vulnerable to [[Wikipedia:Link rot|link rot]]. I've fixed it at [] using the [[Wikipedia:Reflinks]] tool. This tool together with [http://reftag.appspot.com/], can give you a quick and easy way to format almost all bare references in the article. I hope you'll try it out and format your references in the future! --~~~~

Good faith message to potential spammers

1. You are welcome to notify projects like Wikipedia:WikiProject Company the proposed or otherwise discussed deletion. You should also add talk page assessments with keywords like Company or Contry to such articles so that they appear automatically on Wikipedia:Article alerts for related projects (for example if you add {{WikiProject Poland}} to the talk page of an article, any potential deletion of it will be shown to editors monitoring Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Article alerts.
2. If you are paid for your advocacy, you should disclose this on your usperpage, per Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest#howtodisclose. If you are not compensated for your edits, you should state so clearly, because your pattern of edits suggests you are per WP:DUCK, and that's what most people will assume anyway. Through even if you say you are not, whether people believe ot or not is hard to say. Paid-for editors habitually lie, unfortunately, which means that few honest editors in this area of editing face major WP:AGF problems, for which I do apologize. But choosing to edit topic area full of spammers means dealing with the consequences, I am afraid.
3. Please read WP:CORPSPAM and WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES.
4. If you are truly editing those topics without compensation, here's my advice: don't create articles on startups; they will soon find someone and pay them to do it anyway - you are taking food away from some poor spammer. Instead, consider editing topics like (let's assume you are interested in Indian telecoms, for example) Open Access in India, Telecommunications in India, Net neutrality in India or such. They are much more useful for the public, but don't have anyone paying for improving their quality.

Frankly, whether one edits non-startup content or not is a good determinant, per WP:DUCK, whether one is a paid-for spammer or not. Food for thought. Take care,

{{Annual readership}}

Most common assessments:

living=yes

{{WikiProject Poland|class=stub|importance=low}}{{WikiProject Biographies|class=stub|living=yes}}

{{WikiProject Poland|class=start|importance=low}}{{WikiProject Biographies|class=start|living=yes}}

living=no

{{WikiProject Poland|class=stub|importance=low}}{{WikiProject Biographies|class=stub|living=no}}

{{WikiProject Poland|class=start|importance=low}}{{WikiProject Biographies|class=start|living=no}}

company

{{WikiProject Poland|class=stub|importance=low}}{{WikiProject Companies|class=stub|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Poland|class=start|importance=low}}{{WikiProject Companies|class=start|importance=low}}

other

{{WikiProject Poland|class=stub|importance=low}}{{WikiProject replaceme|class=stub|importance=low}}

{{WikiProject Poland|class=start|importance=low}}{{WikiProject replaceme|class=start|importance=low}}

Speedy

real person, individual animal(s), organization, web content or organized event

{{Db-a7}}

Prods: endorse

{{Proposed deletion endorsed|I concur with the nominator }}

bio

{{notability|Biographies}}{{Subst:prod|The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (biographies)]] requirement. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and [[WP:ECHO|ping me back]] through [[WP:ECHO]] or by leaving a note at [[User talk:Piotrus]]. Thank you. }}

org

{{notability|organizations}}{{Subst:prod|The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (companies)]] requirement. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and [[WP:ECHO|ping me back]] through [[WP:ECHO]] or by leaving a note at [[User talk:Piotrus]]. Thank you. }}

soft

{{notability|software}}{{Subst:prod|The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] requirement nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (software)]] supplementary essay. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and [[WP:ECHO|ping me back]] through [[WP:ECHO]] or by leaving a note at [[User talk:Piotrus]]. Thank you. }}

fiction

{{notability|fiction}}{{Subst:prod|The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] requirement nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)]] supplementary essay. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and [[WP:ECHO|ping me back]] through [[WP:ECHO]] or by leaving a note at [[User talk:Piotrus]]. Thank you. }}

AfD

use {{subst:afdx|2nd}} for n-th nom

bio

{{notability}} {{subst:afd}}

{{subst:afd2|pg={{subst:SUBPAGENAME}}|cat=B|text=I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (biographies)]] requirement. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. " It was deprodded by [[User:]] with the following rationale "". }} ~~~~

{{subst:afd2|pg={{subst:SUBPAGENAME}}|cat=B|text=I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (biographies)]] requirement. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. " It was deprodded by [[User:]] with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). }} ~~~~

org

{{subst:afd2|pg={{subst:SUBPAGENAME}}|cat=O|text=I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (companies)]] requirement. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by [[User:]] with the following rationale "". As I discussed in my [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2015-04-08/Op-ed|Signpost Op-Ed]], this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam.}} ~~~~

{{subst:afd2|pg={{subst:SUBPAGENAME}}|cat=O|text=I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (companies)]] requirement. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by [[User:]] with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). As I discussed in my [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2015-04-08/Op-ed|Signpost Op-Ed]], this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam.}} ~~~~

soft

{{subst:afd2|pg={{subst:SUBPAGENAME}}|cat=O|text=I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] requirement nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (software)]] supplementary essay. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by [[User:]] with the following rationale "". }} ~~~~

{{subst:afd2|pg={{subst:SUBPAGENAME}}|cat=O|text=I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] requirement nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (software)]] supplementary essay. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by [[User:]] with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD). }} ~~~~

fict

{{subst:afd2|pg={{subst:SUBPAGENAME}}|cat=O|text=I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] requirement nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)]] supplementary essay. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by [[User:]] with the following rationale "". }} ~~~~

{{subst:afd2|pg={{subst:SUBPAGENAME}}|cat=O|text=I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing [[Wikipedia:General notability guideline]] requirement nor the more detailed [[Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)]] supplementary essay. [[WP:BEFORE]] did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by [[User:]] with no rationale (despite the fact that I explicitly asked for one in the PROD).}} ~~~~

* '''Delete''' due to lack of [[WP:GNG|significant coverage]] in multiple [[WP:RS|reliable]], [[WP:IS|independent sources]] <small>([[WP:42|?]])</small> which in turn indicates problems with [[Wikipedia:Notability]].