I have very little respect for wikipedia overall, though I appreciate its concept, many (though certainly not all) of its foundational systems, and also simply the sheer amount of work and passion that's been put into it.
The platform is otherwise something dominated by a well orchestrated "community" that abandoned facts long ago in favor of citing whatever major media headlines agree with the high IQ denizens of its administration.
You'll likely see me occasionally making small edits to random articles, or making nothing at all even. That is until I occasionally go on the spree on whatever topic I'm hyper fixated on at the moment.
Was kinda hoping to make it to 1000 edits by the end of 2023 but that isn't happening lmao. (this prediction was correct as I ended the year with 950 edits)
For me, whenever my dumbass edit gets reverted by someone who actually knows a lick of stuff, it always feels great if they refer to my edit as "good faith". Feels better than getting any thank.
On the topic of style, I believe that one should put what they know people will enjoy reading over what the MoS says.
There is one article that I can say I've contributed significantly to, mainly out of obsession.
Everybody say it with me now: VECTOR 2022 IS ASS
↓ USERBOXEN BELOW
↓
Randomness
This user thinks that the plural of userbox is no parameter specified!. They are completely wrong.
This user knows that all groups, however crazy they may be, have just as much a right to free speech as anybody else and WILL NOT TOLERATE "hate speech" laws or attempts to prevent people from expressing their views.
This user believes that a tomato is biologically a fruit, but socially a vegetable.
This user understands biological evolution and accepts it as a scientifically established fact.
This user believes that Nationalismisgood for culture but bad for politics.
