Boxed wisdom
|
The importance scale used in the assessment department is, at present, highly generic. This makes it somewhat more difficult to use than perhaps should be the case.
Using a loose taxonomy with a principle of importance, I think we can make things far more approachable without requiring a substantial set of re-classifications. The current system is:
Status | Meaning of Status |
---|---|
Top | This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information. |
High | This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge. |
Mid | This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas. |
Low | This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia. |
In general, a player is less important than a club, is less important than a league, is less important than an association, is less important than any global tournament/organisation/rule definition. Likewise, a stadium or other dependent article would normally be one rank lower than the club who own/use it. ⁂veila# 07:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
![]() |
I award veila this Working Man's Barnstar Award in recognition of the work carried out upon not only the Template:Football player infobox but also the large number of articles which it affected. Thanks for being bold.
|