Contents

User talk:Ïvana

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Arecibo_message 67.149.172.22 (talk) 01:42, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ïvana. If you’re able to could you leave your opinion on the matter, if possible. 2001:D08:2940:8AA5:17DD:817B:1BEC:3F9E (talk) 17:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for participating in the June 2024 backlog drive! You scored 229 points while adding citations to articles during WikiProject Reliability's first {{citation needed}} backlog drive, earning you this citation barnstar. Thanks for helping out!

Pichpich (talk) 21:40, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I saw that you reverted my recent edit on the page for “Rats” by Ghost, in which I mentioned under composition that it contained the “Spöksonat” motif. As a composer myself I thought it was an important piece of information about the track and certainly fit under the category I added it under. My question is, respectfully, why do you feel that this information should not be present in the article?

Thanks, siliconmonday SiliconMonday (talk) 14:16, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SiliconMonday: Per WP:BURDEN, which I cited in my revert, the burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution. Unsourced material will be removed. - Ïvana (talk) 18:48, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully, the source is my ears. Listen to the two songs SiliconMonday (talk) 00:18, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]