Contents

User talk:1.42.173.32

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Katharine Cornell, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Flami72 (talk) 11:59, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sheila Kennelly, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Flami72 (talk) 12:25, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The New York Times, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 13:22, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

And please stop placing images that disrupt the arrangement of articles. Acroterion (talk) 03:35, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And please stop adding honorifics, they're only used in specific situations. Acroterion (talk) 03:44, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Acroterion (talk) 04:05, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edittoIan Dickson (TV personality). Jim1138 (talk) 20:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please verify that an image exists before adding it. See wp:images for information. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 20:28, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1.42.173.32 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why Am I Blocked, Everything I Have Added Is Sourced, Plus Not To Pick Nits, But Member MaterialScientist, Has Had A Ardent Hatred Towards Me Since Day 1

Decline reason:

Personal attacks will not get you unblocked. Nothing appears to have changed since I blocked you, I do not see evidence that you are able to edit Wikipedia productively, and you have wasted a lot of other editors' time fixing problems you've introduced. Acroterion (talk) 01:49, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|Not attacking anybody, just stating that this member has a hatred, anyway the reason i appeal again the block, is if i disrupt an edit, i make sure it is fixed, i do not leave an article unmended}}

If you continue attacking people your access to this talkpage will be removed for the duration of the block. Acroterion (talk) 02:01, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|okay, i just stick to the reasons i state if i make a mistake or error, it is not left unmended , i go about fixing it immediately}} Just a footnote, if a person is blocked,they state's you can still contact other users, this is not true, i have tried this

No, you may not edit anything other than this page, and your time doing that is running out if you keep fooling around with it. I've commented out the second unblock notice. Acroterion (talk) 02:13, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you remove a declined unblock notice again I will remove talkpage access. Acroterion (talk) 02:24, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

why cant i remove it, and start afresh, anyhow not attacking anyone, there is NO hatred and major drama's this end, mate, just some people are good hearted and some are not {{unblock|i have contributed a lot and there is no need for this block at all, i have stated my faults, that i do not leave any article unmended, and if i make a mistake or error, i fix it straight away without question, everyone has the right to edit wikipedia and nobody is exempt, regardless of ones differing in opinions or belief systems, blocking someones access is just a nasty and unkind thing to do, especially when they try there hardest and do repair everything, even if they damage it with a simple spelling error, i try to avoid conflict, and do try to genuinely be a good hearted and loving human being, will honour obligations, will stop disruptive editing, and make sure i have written everything down in preview, before changing}} {{Unblock|will not be disruptive, and use the sandbox, before saving edits}}

There is no need to use the sandbox if you use "Show preview". But you need to be very careful. Check that your edit doesn't affect other parts of the page such as references. Jim1138 (talk) 06:27, 22 January 2017 (UTC) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.[reply]

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 06:27, 22 January 2017 (UTC) Thank You Jim, You Are Nice Jim, i am Just Me, Not Perfect Just Me!!![reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1.42.173.32 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Have read the article on disruptive editing, and will follow all sanctions, if i need help, will first go to the help page or tea house first

Decline reason:

As one of the sanctions is your block, your unblock request is actually saying you wish the block to remain in place. On those grounds, I'm declining your unblock request. You are permitted to make one more unblock request if you wish. Please do not have multiple unblock requests open at the same time, though. Yamla (talk) 13:25, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank-You for your message Jim, you are nice man

Only one unblock request at a time, please. --Yamla (talk) 13:23, 22 January 2017 (UTC) Thank-You Yamla[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1.42.173.32 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have contributed a lot to this project and there is no need of this block at all, i have stated my faults, that i do not leave an article unmended, and if i make a mistake or error, i fix it straight away without question everyone has the right to edit wikipedia and no one is exempt, regardless of ones differing in opinions or belief systems, and blocking ones access is just a nasty and unkind thing to do, especially when one try's there hardest and does repair everything, even if there is a spelling error, i try to avoid conflict, and do try genuinely to be a good hearted and loving human being, i will honour obligations of reinstatement and stop making disruptive edit/s, i have done some research on editing and disruptive editing, and understand the damage that can be caused, even when everything is done in ones "good faith"

Decline reason:

Although you say that you will stop making disruptive edits, you show no awareness at all of what was disruptive about your editing, which makes it probable that if you are unblocked you will continue to make the same mistakes. No, nobody has a "right" to edit Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a privately owned web site, and the owners choose to allow anyone who follows Wikipedia policies and guidelines and edits constructively to edit, but they have every right to withdraw that privilege. Posting irrelevant stuff about "differing in opinions or belief systems", as though you think that is the reason for the block, suggests neither that you understand the block nor that you have the ability to think clearly that would be required for you to start editing constructively. I do believe that you have been acting in good faith, but almost everything you say suggests that you actually don't understand what is being said to you or what the problems with your editing are. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also thank you of your help and advice Jim1138, your kindness is always appreciated

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

1.42.173.32 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Will be more accurate in subsequent editing

Decline reason:

This does nothing to convince me that you have taken in any of what has been stated above. On this basis, there seems no point in allowing you to continue to post unblock requests, and your ability to edit this page has been revoked. Optimist on the run (talk) 18:11, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. (WHOIS (alt • old) Geolocate (Alternate) Proxy Checker Current blocks XTools Global contributions) (RIRs: Africa America Asia-Pacific Europe Latin America/Caribbean)