This is a Wikipediauser talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:1234r00t.
Please note that any requests for pages or help should be made here
Please do not post silly comments or vandalism. Personal attacks, vandalism, yelling-type comments and other forms of disruption will be immediately reverted and users trolling or vandalizing may be blocked for more than one offense. Use the Sandbox for testing edits and the like. For those asking a question, making a comment or request, alerting me for mistakes, deletion of page discussion or other stuff or any incidents or any other fluff, leave it here and I will try if possible to answer as soon as possible. Thank You!
For editors reverting vandalism, thank you very much!
Some fans and friends have brought to my attention just how much my page needs editing. Whoever put it up messed up, repeats and left out my writing and directing etc. I am wiki illiterate and have little time to fix and add stuff like my tv writer/directer debit holiday baggage with Cheryl Ladd and barry Bostwick
Premiered on lifetime.
Do i need a talk back page?
So there is a page for this guy [3] who is a businessman from Russia who has a large philanthropic activity too. The page is written completely as a press-release from his affiliates. His business activities are covered very briefly and in superlative terms. When I try adding details of his business activities (all well sourced) or refer to his as an oligarch (which is sourced too), or add references to his involvement in some political and business wars, all that gets removed. I add the "neutrality disputed" banner and started a talk page to discuss the matters with the other editor, but no response so far. Just wondering what next can I do?
Participation:
We have had 58 people sign up for this drive so far, which compares favorably with our last drive, and 27 have copy-edited at least one article. If you have signed up but have not yet copy-edited any articles, please consider doing so. Every bit helps! If you haven't signed up yet, it's not too late. Join us!
Progress report:
Our target of completing the 2010 articles has almost been reached, with only 56 remaining of the 194 we had at the start of the drive. The last ones are always the most difficult, so thank you if you are able to help copy-edit any of the remaining articles. We have reduced the total backlog by 163 articles so far.
Special thanks:
Special thanks to Stfg, who has been going through the backlog and doing some preliminary vetting of the articles—removing copyright violations, doing initial clean-up, and nominating some for deletion. This work has helped make the drive a more pleasant experience for all our volunteers.
Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 3101submissions waiting to be reviewed and many help requests at our Help Desk.
Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?
If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog. You might wish to add {{AFC status}}or{{AfC Defcon}} to your userpage, which will alert you to the number of open submissions.
We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just 2 or 3 reviews, it would be extremely beneficial.
On behalf of the Articles for Creation project, TheSpecialUserTSU
