Contents

User talk:213.249.155.239/Archive 1

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Intrigue 04:34, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

BMIComp (talk) 1 July 2005 09:03 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Laura Scudder | Talk 8 July 2005 14:24 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you willbeblocked from editing Wikipedia. Stewart Adcock 16:04, 13 July 2005 (UTC)

Since more than a month has past since your last warning, I will give you a final one, but that's it. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:41, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

This message is regarding the page Postcolonial feminism. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.--Blue520 10:02, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

Hi,
I am a user with IP address 213.249.155.239
This address is part of a set of proxy servers provided by EMBC, the East Midlands Broadband Consortium, who provide broadband access to schools and colleges in the East Midlands area of England.
This is the first time I have seen a warning that these addresses are being used to pollute wikipedia, though it comes as little surprise as I am frequently blocked from posting comments at slashdot as the proxy is used by comment spammers and trolls there.
I am not certain of whether the proxy is merely being misused by users behind it, or if it is in fact open to the wide world and thus open to abuse. The latter is unlikely, though given my experience with the broadband providers, it would not surprise me.
I can't really speak for all users behind the proxy, and I'm sure some are behind the problem, though I feel it would be a shame if we were all barred from contributing. I do fully understand your frustration though, so if you feel this is the course of action that must be taken for the greater good, then go ahead.
Cheers,
Peter
--213.249.155.239 10:43, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the information Peter. Now for the vandals on this IP, here is one final warning.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you willbeblocked from editing Wikipedia. Academic Challenger 02:21, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you willbeblocked from editing Wikipedia. --Syrthiss 12:55, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

You have been blocked for 48 hours for continuing to vandalise Wikipedia despite repeated requests not to. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Hall Monitor 23:41, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

This message is regarding the article UrbanDictionary. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia that people have worked hard to create. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. [ contribs • block • 1block log ] -- JoanneB 10:12, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

This message is regarding the article Telework. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. Shawn File:SFerrier Talk Redirect.png 09:08, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Please cease vandalizing the Age of consent. If you do it again, you will be banned. Thanks. --Woohookitty^{(cat scratches)} 12:00, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you willbeblocked from editing Wikipedia. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:45, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I have edited wikipedia from a school computer and it came up with this ip address. If this address were blocked it would block the whole of Tupton Hall School and possibly others in Derbyshire.

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Izehar (talk) 12:09, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

This message is regarding the page Hostile Space. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. JoanneB 14:59, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Johnleemk | Talk 15:00, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --bainer (talk) 10:07, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --bainer (talk) 10:08, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you willbeblocked from editing Wikipedia. – Ian Cairns 10:46, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

You're on the vandalism page. --TheDoctor10 (talk|email) 14:09, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

As they say in the movies, "ooh behave". Seriously, though, we are trying to write an encyclopaedia here, so don't make joke edits. Some readers looking for a serious article mightn't find them amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do a bit seriously here. OK?

Izehar (talk) 14:15, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi. I've told you before that switching IPs to avoid blocks is not okay. As I understand this whole thing, the problem is that you want to include a number of copyrighted images in these articles, taken from a website that has ordered Wikipedia to not use their content. I'm going to block this IP address because of the evasion-of-block problem, and I hope that you will reconsider the way that you are approaching this situation, because it does you no favours to create more evidence of being disruptive. Jkelly 20:36, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

None of those images are copyrighted. They are images of movie posters (which are now in the public domain) and screen shots of the films themselves. Pietro is trying to remove them and leave no content, For example see the Comicolor page and what he did to it.213.249.155.239 20:39, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

Looking at Comicolor I see that you added Image:Alibaba.jpg, which is marked as a copyrighted promotional poster. Is there any reason at all to think that it would be in the public domain? If it is from a 1936 movie, the copyright likely still holds. See [1] for a tabular breakdown of US copyright law. Jkelly 21:24, 25 December 2005 (UTC)