Contents

User talk:216.250.156.66

New messages will appear at the bottom of this page.

Attention: Last edited: Last edited by: 13:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC) MalnadachBot (talk · contribs) This host, 216-250-156-66.host.secantnet.net (216.250.156.66 ), is registered to Secant Technologies. In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report. If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time. If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block. Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Grand Duchess Anastasia Nikolaevna of Russia, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —αἰτίας •discussion• 22:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Arnel Pineda has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps 18:08, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to United States v. Nixon, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically revertedbyClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: United States v. Nixon was changedby216.250.156.66 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-06-02T19:37:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 19:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Your edits appear to be exclusively aimed at targeting and reverting those of another editor. Please explain why you feel this is necessary. Ckatz^chat_spy 22:01, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I appear to have another Wiki-stalker. This one seems to revert any of my edits, not just my reversions/adjustments of the 99. anon on Global Warming(TM) and related (in his mind, anyway) articles. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 10:09, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

... Wikipedia:Don't feed the divas ... 20:51, 10 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.87.29.188 (talk)

Hello. 99.56.122.24 (talk) 10:01, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are clearly a WP:SOCKof97.87.29.188 (talk · contribs). Blocking. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:14, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

30 day soft block for block evasion requested FYI I just requested a 30 day soft block for block evasion from this IP NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 05:24, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per User_talk:64.27.194.74#:-D, Hello? 64.27.194.74 (talk) 18:51, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know Michigan very well and using geolocate get an idea of where your IP is based.... do you actually drive back and forth between St Joe, Kalamazoo, Grand Rapids, and so on just to get around the long list of sock-blocks? Is that worth the time and/or gas? Sigh. Well, probably the other editors besides myself that think you should be banned will just keep reverting what you post. Beats me why you bother. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:30, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is very confusing. Could you please go back to User_talk:NewsAndEventsGuy#Why_did_you_remove_this_from_Climate_change_in_the_United_States.3F?

216.250.156.66 (talk) 20:32, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Alf.laylah.wa.laylah. An edit that you recently made to Racial profiling seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! — alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 01:13, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

See #Blocked above. You are still clearly the same editor, who still has an active block, as the one-year block issued in 2012 (under a different IP) has been extended each time you violate it. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:29, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Prove it. 216.250.156.66 (talk) 19:30, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessarily, unless you can find an admin willing to disagree.

If you would prefer to have all your entries in Wikipedia:A nice cup of tea and a sit down removed, that would be acceptable. What is not acceptable is for there to be entries there from a then-blocked editor. Please let me know which you would prefer: struck out, or removed. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:34, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Those are not my choices. 216.250.156.66 (talk) 19:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Too bad. It is unacceptable for banned editors to have entries in Wikipedia:A nice cup of tea and a sit down. If you can find another acceptable choice, I would go with it, even though it might be considered a violation on my part.

I have some errands to run. I should be back within 1-1/2 hours, have a chance to look here again, and be gone the rest of the night. Because I will not be very available, I have no objection if another admin, after consideration of your edit history, decides to unblock. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 19:53, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Current Events guidelines specifically say "Don't create subheaders linking to general topics or lists" so please don't do that, like you did here. Thanks! Kaldari (talk) 19:42, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DatGoodDude342. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (film) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. DatGoodDude342 14:29, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Ganbaruby. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to David Frum because they seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 22:15, 17 September 2020 (UTC) Moved to "Books" section. 216.250.156.66 (talk) 22:19, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. (WHOIS (alt • old) Geolocate (Alternate) Proxy Checker Current blocks XTools Global contributions) (RIRs: Africa America Asia-Pacific Europe Latin America/Caribbean)